lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b46d212665a3054d736de2cae61e209c@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 10:41:59 +0530
From:   mdalam@...eaurora.org
To:     Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Cc:     miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
        boris.brezillon@...labora.com, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sricharan@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update last code word register

On 2021-01-28 13:22, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 09:31:45AM +0530, Md Sadre Alam wrote:
>> From QPIC version 2.0 onwards new register got added to
>> read last codeword. This change will update the same.
>> 
>> For first three code word READ_LOCATION_n register will be
>> use.For last code word READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_n register will be
>> use.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Md Sadre Alam <mdalam@...eaurora.org>
> 
> I gave this patch a try on SDX55 board but not able to resolve an issue 
> and
> I think it is related to reading the last code word which this patch is 
> trying
> to address. For my patch on supporting QPIC v2 IP, I tested with 
> SDX55-MTP board
> and I never hit any issue. But on my new dev board (Telit FN980), there 
> seems to
> be an issue while populating the partitions and tracing down that bug 
> lands me
> in copy_last_cw() function.
> 
> The issue only happens while creating the 3rd partition on Telit board 
> whose
> size differs when compared with MTP. The board just reboots into QDL 
> mode
> whenever it tries to read the last code word.
> 
> Below is the snippet of partition layout:
> 
> Telit partitions:
> 
> [    1.082015] 0: sbl offs=0x00000000 size=0x0000000a attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.082702] 1: mibib offs=0x0000000a size=0x0000000a attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.083488] 2: ico offs=0x00000014 size=0x00000014 attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.084572] 3: efs2 offs=0x00000028 size=0x0000002c attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.085316] 4: tz offs=0x00000054 size=0x00000007 attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.086089] 5: tz_devcfg offs=0x0000005b size=0x00000004 
> attr:0x000000ff
> ....
> 
> MTP partitions:
> 
> [    1.573871] 0: sbl offs=0x00000000 size=0x0000000a attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.581139] 1: mibib offs=0x0000000a size=0x0000000a attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.587362] 2: efs2 offs=0x00000014 size=0x0000002c attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.593853] 3: tz offs=0x00000040 size=0x00000007 attr:0x000000ff
> [    1.599860] 4: tz_devcfg offs=0x00000047 size=0x00000004 
> attr:0x000000ff
> ...
> 
> So until I figure this out, please keep this patch on hold!

   There was some corner case I missed in V3 patch. I have fixed this in 
V4 patch.
   I have done some tress testing as well with V4 patch on IPQ5018 
platform using "nand-utils"
   and "mtd_test.ko" , Now its working fine. Can you test with V4 patch 
once.
> 
> Thanks,
> Mani
> 
>> ---
>> [V3]
>>  * Added else condition for last code word in update_rw_regs().
>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c | 84 
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c 
>> b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> index 667e4bf..50ff6e3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/qcom_nandc.c
>> @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@
>>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_1		0xf24
>>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_2		0xf28
>>  #define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_3		0xf2c
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0	0xf40
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1	0xf44
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2	0xf48
>> +#define	NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3	0xf4c
>> 
>>  /* dummy register offsets, used by write_reg_dma */
>>  #define	NAND_DEV_CMD1_RESTORE		0xdead
>> @@ -187,6 +191,12 @@ nandc_set_reg(nandc, 
>> NAND_READ_LOCATION_##reg,			\
>>  	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
>>  	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> 
>> +#define nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, reg, offset, size, is_last)	\
>> +nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_##reg,			\
>> +	      ((offset) << READ_LOCATION_OFFSET) |		\
>> +	      ((size) << READ_LOCATION_SIZE) |			\
>> +	      ((is_last) << READ_LOCATION_LAST))
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Returns the actual register address for all NAND_DEV_ registers
>>   * (i.e. NAND_DEV_CMD0, NAND_DEV_CMD1, NAND_DEV_CMD2 and 
>> NAND_DEV_CMD_VLD)
>> @@ -316,6 +326,10 @@ struct nandc_regs {
>>  	__le32 read_location1;
>>  	__le32 read_location2;
>>  	__le32 read_location3;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last0;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last1;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last2;
>> +	__le32 read_location_last3;
>> 
>>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_clr;
>>  	__le32 erased_cw_detect_cfg_set;
>> @@ -644,6 +658,14 @@ static __le32 *offset_to_nandc_reg(struct 
>> nandc_regs *regs, int offset)
>>  		return &regs->read_location2;
>>  	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_3:
>>  		return &regs->read_location3;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last0;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_1:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last1;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_2:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last2;
>> +	case NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_3:
>> +		return &regs->read_location_last3;
>>  	default:
>>  		return NULL;
>>  	}
>> @@ -719,9 +741,14 @@ static void update_rw_regs(struct qcom_nand_host 
>> *host, int num_cw, bool read)
>>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_READ_STATUS, host->clrreadstatus);
>>  	nandc_set_reg(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1);
>> 
>> -	if (read)
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> -				   host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> +	if (read) {
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, host->use_ecc ?
>> +					host->cw_data : host->cw_size, 1);
>> +	}
>>  }
>> 
>>  /*
>> @@ -1096,9 +1123,13 @@ static void config_nand_page_read(struct 
>> qcom_nand_controller *nandc)
>>  static void
>>  config_nand_cw_read(struct qcom_nand_controller *nandc, bool use_ecc)
>>  {
>> -	if (nandc->props->is_bam)
>> +	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2)
>> +			write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_LAST_CW_0,
>> +				      1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>>  		write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_READ_LOCATION_0, 4,
>>  			      NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> +	}
>> 
>>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_FLASH_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>>  	write_reg_dma(nandc, NAND_EXEC_CMD, 1, NAND_BAM_NEXT_SGL);
>> @@ -1633,16 +1664,28 @@ qcom_nandc_read_cw_raw(struct mtd_info *mtd, 
>> struct nand_chip *chip,
>>  	}
>> 
>>  	if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, read_loc, data_size1, 0);
>>  		read_loc += data_size1;
>> 
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, read_loc, oob_size1, 0);
>>  		read_loc += oob_size1;
>> 
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 2, read_loc, data_size2, 0);
>>  		read_loc += data_size2;
>> 
>> -		nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>> +		if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && cw == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 0);
>> +		else
>> +			nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 3, read_loc, oob_size2, 1);
>>  	}
>> 
>>  	config_nand_cw_read(nandc, false);
>> @@ -1873,14 +1916,27 @@ static int read_page_ecc(struct qcom_nand_host 
>> *host, u8 *data_buf,
>> 
>>  		if (nandc->props->is_bam) {
>>  			if (data_buf && oob_buf) {
>> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
>> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
>> -						   oob_size, 1);
>> +				if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 1)) {
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 1, data_size,
>> +								oob_size, 1);
>> +				} else {
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 0);
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 1, data_size,
>> +							   oob_size, 1);
>> +				}
>>  			} else if (data_buf) {
>> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
>> +				if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
>> +				else
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, 0, data_size, 1);
>>  			} else {
>> -				nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
>> -						   oob_size, 1);
>> +				if (nandc->props->qpic_v2 && i == (ecc->steps - 1))
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc_last(nandc, 0, data_size,
>> +								oob_size, 1);
>> +				else
>> +					nandc_set_read_loc(nandc, 0, data_size,
>> +							   oob_size, 1);
>>  			}
>>  		}
>> 
>> --
>> 2.7.4
>> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ