[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f67b285671aaa4b7903733455a730e1@dev.tdt.de>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 06:56:10 +0100
From: Martin Schiller <ms@....tdt.de>
To: Xie He <xie.he.0141@...il.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Linux X25 <linux-x25@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: hdlc_x25: Use qdisc to queue outgoing LAPB
frames
On 2021-01-28 23:06, Xie He wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:47 AM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> wrote:
>>
>> Noob question - could you point at or provide a quick guide to
>> layering
>> here? I take there is only one netdev, and something maintains an
>> internal queue which is not stopped when HW driver stops the qdisc?
>
> Yes, there is only one netdev. The LAPB module (net/lapb/) (which is
> used as a library by the netdev driver - hdlc_x25.c) is maintaining an
> internal queue which is not stopped when the HW driver stops the
> qdisc.
>
> The queue is "write_queue" in "struct lapb_cb" in
> "include/net/lapb.h". The code that takes skbs out of the queue and
> feeds them to lower layers for transmission is at the "lapb_kick"
> function in "net/lapb/lapb_out.c".
>
> The layering is like this:
>
> Upper layer (Layer 3) (net/x25/ or net/packet/)
>
> ^
> | L3 packets (with control info)
> v
>
> The netdev driver (hdlc_x25.c)
>
> ^
> | L3 packets
> v
>
> The LAPB Module (net/lapb/)
>
> ^
> | LAPB (L2) frames
> v
>
> The netdev driver (hdlc_x25.c)
>
> ^
> | LAPB (L2) frames
> | (also called HDLC frames in the context of the HDLC subsystem)
> v
>
> HDLC core (hdlc.c)
>
> ^
> | HDLC frames
> v
>
> HDLC Hardware Driver
@Xie: Thank you for the detailed presentation.
>
>> Sounds like we're optimizing to prevent drops, and this was not
>> reported from production, rather thru code inspection. Ergo I think
>> net-next will be more appropriate here, unless Martin disagrees.
>
> Yes, I have no problem in targeting net-next instead. Thanks!
I agree.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists