linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: Disable CET instrumentation in the kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3b24d8c8-a1fe-5b7c-6e96-65a719588f49@suse.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 08:23:23 +0200
From:   Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu@...il.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Disable CET instrumentation in the kernel



On 28.01.21 г. 23:52 ч., Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> 
> With retpolines disabled, some configurations of GCC will add Intel CET
> instrumentation to the kernel by default.  That breaks certain tracing
> scenarios by adding a superfluous ENDBR64 instruction before the fentry
> call, for functions which can be called indirectly.
> 
> CET instrumentation isn't currently necessary in the kernel, as CET is
> only supported in user space.  Disable it unconditionally.
> 
> Reported-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>

Tested-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>