[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63459bb3-da22-b2a4-71ee-e67660fd2e12@kaspersky.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 09:41:50 +0300
From: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>,
Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@...gle.com>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stsp2@...dex.ru" <stsp2@...dex.ru>,
"oxffffaa@...il.com" <oxffffaa@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 00/13] virtio/vsock: introduce SOCK_SEQPACKET
support
On 28.01.2021 20:19, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Hi Arseny,
> I reviewed a part, tomorrow I hope to finish the other patches.
>
> Just a couple of comments in the TODOs below.
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 02:09:00PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>> This patchset impelements support of SOCK_SEQPACKET for virtio
>> transport.
>> As SOCK_SEQPACKET guarantees to save record boundaries, so to
>> do it, new packet operation was added: it marks start of record (with
>> record length in header), such packet doesn't carry any data. To send
>> record, packet with start marker is sent first, then all data is sent
>> as usual 'RW' packets. On receiver's side, length of record is known
> >from packet with start record marker. Now as packets of one socket
>> are not reordered neither on vsock nor on vhost transport layers, such
>> marker allows to restore original record on receiver's side. If user's
>> buffer is smaller that record length, when all out of size data is
>> dropped.
>> Maximum length of datagram is not limited as in stream socket,
>> because same credit logic is used. Difference with stream socket is
>> that user is not woken up until whole record is received or error
>> occurred. Implementation also supports 'MSG_EOR' and 'MSG_TRUNC' flags.
>> Tests also implemented.
>>
>> Arseny Krasnov (13):
>> af_vsock: prepare for SOCK_SEQPACKET support
>> af_vsock: prepare 'vsock_connectible_recvmsg()'
>> af_vsock: implement SEQPACKET rx loop
>> af_vsock: implement send logic for SOCK_SEQPACKET
>> af_vsock: rest of SEQPACKET support
>> af_vsock: update comments for stream sockets
>> virtio/vsock: dequeue callback for SOCK_SEQPACKET
>> virtio/vsock: fetch length for SEQPACKET record
>> virtio/vsock: add SEQPACKET receive logic
>> virtio/vsock: rest of SOCK_SEQPACKET support
>> virtio/vsock: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport
>> vhost/vsock: setup SEQPACKET ops for transport
>> vsock_test: add SOCK_SEQPACKET tests
>>
>> drivers/vhost/vsock.c | 7 +-
>> include/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 12 +
>> include/net/af_vsock.h | 6 +
>> include/uapi/linux/virtio_vsock.h | 9 +
>> net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 543 ++++++++++++++++------
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport.c | 4 +
>> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 295 ++++++++++--
>> tools/testing/vsock/util.c | 32 +-
>> tools/testing/vsock/util.h | 3 +
>> tools/testing/vsock/vsock_test.c | 126 +++++
>> 10 files changed, 862 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>>
>> TODO:
>> - Support for record integrity control. As transport could drop some
>> packets, something like "record-id" and record end marker need to
>> be implemented. Idea is that SEQ_BEGIN packet carries both record
>> length and record id, end marker(let it be SEQ_END) carries only
>> record id. To be sure that no one packet was lost, receiver checks
>> length of data between SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END(it must be same with
>> value in SEQ_BEGIN) and record ids of SEQ_BEGIN and SEQ_END(this
>> means that both markers were not dropped. I think that easiest way
>> to implement record id for SEQ_BEGIN is to reuse another field of
>> packet header(SEQ_BEGIN already uses 'flags' as record length).For
>> SEQ_END record id could be stored in 'flags'.
> I don't really like the idea of reusing the 'flags' field for this
> purpose.
>
>> Another way to implement it, is to move metadata of both SEQ_END
>> and SEQ_BEGIN to payload. But this approach has problem, because
>> if we move something to payload, such payload is accounted by
>> credit logic, which fragments payload, while payload with record
>> length and id couldn't be fragmented. One way to overcome it is to
>> ignore credit update for SEQ_BEGIN/SEQ_END packet.Another solution
>> is to update 'stream_has_space()' function: current implementation
>> return non-zero when at least 1 byte is allowed to use,but updated
>> version will have extra argument, which is needed length. For 'RW'
>> packet this argument is 1, for SEQ_BEGIN it is sizeof(record len +
>> record id) and for SEQ_END it is sizeof(record id).
> Is the payload accounted by credit logic also if hdr.op is not
> VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW?
Yes, on send any packet with payload could be fragmented if
there is not enough space at receiver. On receive 'fwd_cnt' and
'buf_alloc' are updated with header of every packet. Of course,
to every such case i've described i can add check for 'RW'
packet, to exclude payload from credit accounting, but this is
bunch of dumb checks.
>
> I think that we can define a specific header to put after the
> virtio_vsock_hdr when hdr.op is SEQ_BEGIN or SEQ_END, and in this header
> we can store the id and the length of the message.
I think it is better than use payload and touch credit logic
>
>> - What to do, when server doesn't support SOCK_SEQPACKET. In current
>> implementation RST is replied in the same way when listening port
>> is not found. I think that current RST is enough,because case when
>> server doesn't support SEQ_PACKET is same when listener missed(e.g.
>> no listener in both cases).
> I think so, but I'll check better if we can have some issues.
>
> Thanks,
> Stefano
>
>> v2 -> v3:
>> - patches reorganized: split for prepare and implementation patches
>> - local variables are declared in "Reverse Christmas tree" manner
>> - virtio_transport_common.c: valid leXX_to_cpu() for vsock header
>> fields access
>> - af_vsock.c: 'vsock_connectible_*sockopt()' added as shared code
>> between stream and seqpacket sockets.
>> - af_vsock.c: loops in '__vsock_*_recvmsg()' refactored.
>> - af_vsock.c: 'vsock_wait_data()' refactored.
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - patches reordered: af_vsock.c related changes now before virtio vsock
>> - patches reorganized: more small patches, where +/- are not mixed
>> - tests for SOCK_SEQPACKET added
>> - all commit messages updated
>> - af_vsock.c: 'vsock_pre_recv_check()' inlined to
>> 'vsock_connectible_recvmsg()'
>> - af_vsock.c: 'vsock_assign_transport()' returns ENODEV if transport
>> was not found
>> - virtio_transport_common.c: transport callback for seqpacket dequeue
>> - virtio_transport_common.c: simplified
>> 'virtio_transport_recv_connected()'
>> - virtio_transport_common.c: send reset on socket and packet type
>> mismatch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
>>
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists