| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1611906124.1947.22.camel@mhfsdcap03>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:42:04 +0800
From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
To: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
CC: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>, Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Devicetree List <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 6/8] drm/mediatek: enable dither function
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 14:46 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 2:30 PM Yongqiang Niu
> <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 14:24 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 9:33 AM CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi, Hsin-Yi:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 19:23 +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > > > > From: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > > > >
> > > > > for 5 or 6 bpc panel, we need enable dither function
> > > > > to improve the display quality
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Yongqiang Niu <yongqiang.niu@...iatek.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
> > > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > > index ac2cb25620357..6c8f246380a74 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> > > > > #define DITHER_EN BIT(0)
> > > > > #define DISP_DITHER_CFG 0x0020
> > > > > #define DITHER_RELAY_MODE BIT(0)
> > > > > +#define DITHER_ENGINE_EN BIT(1)
> > > > > #define DISP_DITHER_SIZE 0x0030
> > > > >
> > > > > #define LUT_10BIT_MASK 0x03ff
> > > > > @@ -314,9 +315,19 @@ static void mtk_dither_config(struct device *dev, unsigned int w,
> > > > > unsigned int bpc, struct cmdq_pkt *cmdq_pkt)
> > > > > {
> > > > > struct mtk_ddp_comp_dev *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > > > + bool enable = (bpc == 5 || bpc == 6);
> > > >
> > > > I strongly believe that dither function in dither is identical to the
> > > > one in gamma and od, and in mtk_dither_set_common(), 'bpc >=
> > > > MTK_MIN_BPC' is valid, so I believe we need not to limit bpc to 5 or 6.
> > > > But we should consider the case that bpc is invalid in
> > > > mtk_dither_set_common(). Invalid case in gamma and od use different way
> > > > to process. For gamma, dither is default relay mode, so invalid bpc
> > > > would do nothing in mtk_dither_set_common() and result in relay mode.
> > > > For od, it set to relay mode first, them invalid bpc would do nothing in
> > > > mtk_dither_set_common() and result in relay mode. I would like dither,
> > > > gamma and od to process invalid bpc in the same way. One solution is to
> > > > set relay mode in mtk_dither_set_common() for invalid bpc.
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > CK
> > > >
> > >
> > > I modify the mtk_dither_config() to follow:
> > >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > index ac2cb25620357..5b7fcedb9f9a8 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c
> > > @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@
> > > #define DITHER_EN BIT(0)
> > > #define DISP_DITHER_CFG 0x0020
> > > #define DITHER_RELAY_MODE BIT(0)
> > > +#define DITHER_ENGINE_EN BIT(1)
> > > #define DISP_DITHER_SIZE 0x0030
> > >
> > > #define LUT_10BIT_MASK 0x03ff
> > > @@ -166,6 +167,8 @@ void mtk_dither_set_common(void __iomem *regs,
> > > struct cmdq_client_reg *cmdq_reg,
> > > DITHER_ADD_LSHIFT_G(MTK_MAX_BPC - bpc),
> > > cmdq_reg, regs, DISP_DITHER_16);
> > > mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, dither_en, cmdq_reg, regs, cfg);
> > > + } else {
> > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, cmdq_reg, regs, cfg);
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -315,8 +318,12 @@ static void mtk_dither_config(struct device *dev,
> > > unsigned int w,
> > > {
> > > struct mtk_ddp_comp_dev *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > >
> > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg,
> > > priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg,
> > > priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> > > + DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> > > + DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > + mtk_dither_set_common(priv->regs, &priv->cmdq_reg, bpc, DISP_DITHER_CFG,
> > > + DITHER_ENGINE_EN, cmdq_pkt);
> > > }
> > >
> > > So now, not only bpc==5 or 6, but all valid bpc, dither config will
> > > call mtk_dither_set_common() with the flag DITHER_ENGINE_EN(BIT(1)).
> > > od config will call mtk_dither_set_common() with the flag
> > > DISP_DITHERING(BIT(2)).
> > > Additionally for 8173, gamma config will call mtk_dither_set_common()
> > > with the flag DISP_DITHERING (BIT(2))
> > >
> > > For invalid mode all of them will be DITHER_RELAY_MODE.
> > >
> > > Just to make sure that this follows the spec? thanks
> > >
> >
> > for mt8173 gamma, there is no relay mode, only dither enable or not(bit
> > 2).
> > for mt8183 dither, there is dither enable bit 1, and relay mode bit 0
> >
> CK suggested to set relay mode for invalid cases. Or should I just set
> invalid case in mtk_dither_config()? So that invalid case for gamma
> and od would remain its default mode?
>
od and gamma has no relay mode
set relay mode in mtk_dither_config is better
> Besides that, the major difference of this patch and original version
> is that not only bpc ==5 or 6 will set dither enable bit 1. Does this
> looks good to you?
dither only support bpc 4 6 8 , there is no bpc 5 use case,
please modify this error.
and drm only has these bpc
switch (edid->input & DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_MASK) {
case DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_6:
info->bpc = 6;
break;
case DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_8:
info->bpc = 8;
break;
case DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_10:
info->bpc = 10;
break;
case DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_12:
info->bpc = 12;
break;
case DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_14:
info->bpc = 14;
break;
case DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_16:
info->bpc = 16;
break;
case DRM_EDID_DIGITAL_DEPTH_UNDEF:
default:
info->bpc = 0;
break;
}
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > > > - mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > > > + if (enable) {
> > > > > + mtk_dither_set_common(priv->regs, &priv->cmdq_reg, bpc,
> > > > > + DISP_DITHER_CFG, DITHER_ENGINE_EN,
> > > > > + cmdq_pkt);
> > > > > + } else {
> > > > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, DITHER_RELAY_MODE, &priv->cmdq_reg,
> > > > > + priv->regs, DISP_DITHER_CFG);
> > > > > + }
> > > > > +
> > > > > + mtk_ddp_write(cmdq_pkt, h << 16 | w, &priv->cmdq_reg, priv->regs,
> > > > > + DISP_DITHER_SIZE);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > static void mtk_dither_start(struct device *dev)
> > > >
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists