[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <017f6e69-b2ec-aed0-5920-a389199e4cf9@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:43:40 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@...edance.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Laurent Vivier <lvivier@...hat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@...dia.com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 02/10] vringh: add 'iotlb_lock' to synchronize
iotlb accesses
On 2021/1/28 下午10:41, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> Usually iotlb accesses are synchronized with a spinlock.
> Let's request it as a new parameter in vringh_set_iotlb() and
> hold it when we navigate the iotlb in iotlb_translate() to avoid
> race conditions with any new additions/deletions of ranges from
> the ioltb.
Patch looks fine but I wonder if this is the best approach comparing to
do locking by the caller.
Thanks
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/linux/vringh.h | 6 +++++-
> drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/vhost/vringh.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/vringh.h b/include/linux/vringh.h
> index 59bd50f99291..9c077863c8f6 100644
> --- a/include/linux/vringh.h
> +++ b/include/linux/vringh.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ struct vringh {
> /* IOTLB for this vring */
> struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb;
>
> + /* spinlock to synchronize IOTLB accesses */
> + spinlock_t *iotlb_lock;
> +
> /* The function to call to notify the guest about added buffers */
> void (*notify)(struct vringh *);
> };
> @@ -258,7 +261,8 @@ static inline __virtio64 cpu_to_vringh64(const struct vringh *vrh, u64 val)
>
> #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_VHOST_IOTLB)
>
> -void vringh_set_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb);
> +void vringh_set_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
> + spinlock_t *iotlb_lock);
>
> int vringh_init_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, u64 features,
> unsigned int num, bool weak_barriers,
> diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> index 2183a833fcf4..53238989713d 100644
> --- a/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> +++ b/drivers/vdpa/vdpa_sim/vdpa_sim.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,8 @@ struct vdpasim *vdpasim_create(struct vdpasim_dev_attr *dev_attr)
> goto err_iommu;
>
> for (i = 0; i < dev_attr->nvqs; i++)
> - vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[i].vring, vdpasim->iommu);
> + vringh_set_iotlb(&vdpasim->vqs[i].vring, vdpasim->iommu,
> + &vdpasim->iommu_lock);
>
> ret = iova_cache_get();
> if (ret)
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> index 85d85faba058..f68122705719 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vringh.c
> @@ -1074,6 +1074,8 @@ static int iotlb_translate(const struct vringh *vrh,
> int ret = 0;
> u64 s = 0;
>
> + spin_lock(vrh->iotlb_lock);
> +
> while (len > s) {
> u64 size, pa, pfn;
>
> @@ -1103,6 +1105,8 @@ static int iotlb_translate(const struct vringh *vrh,
> ++ret;
> }
>
> + spin_unlock(vrh->iotlb_lock);
> +
> return ret;
> }
>
> @@ -1262,10 +1266,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_init_iotlb);
> * vringh_set_iotlb - initialize a vringh for a ring with IOTLB.
> * @vrh: the vring
> * @iotlb: iotlb associated with this vring
> + * @iotlb_lock: spinlock to synchronize the iotlb accesses
> */
> -void vringh_set_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb)
> +void vringh_set_iotlb(struct vringh *vrh, struct vhost_iotlb *iotlb,
> + spinlock_t *iotlb_lock)
> {
> vrh->iotlb = iotlb;
> + vrh->iotlb_lock = iotlb_lock;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(vringh_set_iotlb);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists