linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] Handle UART without interrupt on TEMT using em485

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5FC36FF8-8F09-4B82-92C0-BE5E0AA2C117@micronovasrl.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 01:12:20 +0100
From:   Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@...ronovasrl.com>
To:     Eric Tremblay <etremblay@...tech-controls.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jslaby@...e.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, matwey.kornilov@...il.com,
        lukas@...ner.de, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com, heiko@...ech.de,
        heiko.stuebner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Handle UART without interrupt on TEMT using em485

Hi Eric,

> Il giorno 29 gen 2021, alle ore 00:37, Eric Tremblay <etremblay@...tech-controls.com> ha scritto:
> 
> The series is mainly about the support of 8250 UART without TEMT
> interrupt. I saw that there was some development in the past but
> it was never merged. Since the last discussion were quite some
> time ago, I was not sure if I should post a v4 over the
> last v3 or start from scratch so I decided to post a new patch. Please
> advice if I should have done the reverse.

Please keep my and Heiko’s SoB and add your SoB too describing between [ ] what Heiko has done and what you’ve done. 
For example:
SoB: Giulio
SoB: Heiko
[Heiko: ...]
SoB Eric
[Eric: improved timeout etc.]

> 
> The approach is a little different from the last proposed patch which was
> doing using a polling at 100us. I tought that it could be really long on 
> some fast baudrate and really not that long on slow baudrate. The current
> approach is to calculate the time of a bytes when the settings are changed.
> When we get the interrupt for the empty FIFO, it's the longer it can take
> to empty the shift register.

Good idea.

> 
> The other two patches are to use that features with the PORT_16550A_FSL64
> found on some chip like the LS1043A.

Do you mind to add my 8250_dw patch that was originally part of this patchset? I had to send it
soon, you’ve preceded me :-)

Thank you
Best regards
Giulio

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Eric Tremblay (3):
> serial: 8250: Handle UART without interrupt on TEMT using em485
> serial: 8250: add compatible for fsl,16550-FIFO64
> serial: 8250: remove UART_CAP_TEMT on PORT_16550A_FSL64
> 
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250.h            |  1 +
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_bcm2835aux.c |  2 +-
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_of.c         |  5 ++
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_omap.c       |  2 +-
> drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_port.c       | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/serial_8250.h               |  2 +
> 6 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.17.1