linux-kernel - [IRQ] IRQ affinity not working properly?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a0d5551e-761b-1571-b8e1-5586ec4d9f3b@windriver.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 13:17:19 -0600
From:   Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...driver.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [IRQ] IRQ affinity not working properly?

Hi,

I'm not subscribed to the list, please cc me on replies.

I have a CentOS 7 linux system with 48 logical CPUs and a number of 
Intel NICs running the i40e driver.  It was booted with 
irqaffinity=0-1,24-25 in the kernel boot args, resulting in 
/proc/irq/default_smp_affinity showing "0000,03000003".   CPUs 2-11 are 
set as "isolated" in the kernel boot args.  The irqbalance daemon is not 
running.

The problem I'm seeing is that /proc/interrupts shows iavf interrupts 
(associated with physical devices running the i40e driver) on other CPUs 
than the expected affinity.  For example, here are some iavf interrupts 
on CPU 4 where I would not expect to see any interrupts given that "cat 
/proc/irq/<NUM>/smp_affinity_list" reports "0-1,24-25" for all these 
interrupts.  (Sorry for the line wrapping.)

cat /proc/interrupts | grep -e CPU -e 941: -e 942: -e 943: -e 944: -e 
945: -e 961: -e 962: -e 963: -e 964: -e 965:

              CPU0       CPU1       CPU2       CPU3 CPU4       CPU5
941:          0          0          0          0 28490          0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-0000:b5:03.6:mbx
942:          0          0          0          0 333832         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-0
943:          0          0          0          0 300842         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-1
944:          0          0          0          0 333845         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-2
945:          0          0          0          0 333822         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-3
961:          0          0          0          0 28492         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge iavf-0000:b5:02.7:mbx
962:          0          0          0          0 435608         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-0
963:          0          0          0          0 394832         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-1
964:          0          0          0          0 398414         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-2
965:          0          0          0          0 192847         0 
IR-PCI-MSI-edge      iavf-net1-TxRx-3

There were IRQs coming in on the "iavf-0000:b5:02.7:mbx" interrupt at 
roughly 1 per second without any traffic, while the interrupt rate on 
the "iavf-net1-TxRx-<X>" seemed to be related to traffic.

Is this expected?  It seems like the IRQ subsystem is not respecting the 
configured SMP affinity for the interrupt in question.  I've also seen 
the same behaviour with igb interrupts.

Anyone have any ideas?

Thanks,

Chris