[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdm-+xK=diSKKXXnS2m1+W6QZ70c7cRKTbtVF=dWi1_8_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:05:59 -0800
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com>, Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>
Cc: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Clang-Built-Linux ML <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>,
Caroline Tice <cmtice@...gle.com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] Kbuild: implement support for DWARF v5
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 1:11 PM Jakub Jelinek <jakub@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 01:05:56PM -0800, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> > > Wasn't that fixed in GAS?
> > > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195
> >
> > $ make LLVM=1 -j72 defconfig
> > $ ./scripts/config -e DEBUG_INFO -e DEBUG_INFO_DWARF5
> > $ make LLVM=1 -j72
> > ...
> > /tmp/init-d50d89.s: Assembler messages:
> > /tmp/init-d50d89.s:10: Error: file number less than one
> > /tmp/init-d50d89.s:11: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized
> > character is `m'
> >
> > which is https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25611.
> >
> > $ as --version | head -n1
> > GNU assembler (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.1
> >
> > Maybe GAS should not need to be told -gdwarf-5 to parse these? Then
> > we would not need to pass -Wa,-gdwarf-5 via clang with
> > -no-integrated-as.
>
> That is what sw#27195 is about, just try current binutils 2.35, 2.36 or
> trunk branches.
Ah, I see. Then I should update the script I add
(scripts/test_dwarf5_support.sh) to feature detect that bug, since
it's the latest of the bunch. Also, should update my comment to note
that this requires binutils greater than 2.35.1 (which is what I have,
which fails, since the backport landed in ... what?!) How was this
backported to 2.35
(https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27195#c12, Jan 26
2021) when binutils-2_35_1 was tagged sept 19 2020? Or will there be
a binutils 2.35.2 point release?
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists