[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <43f264df-2f3a-ea4c-c737-85cdc6714bd8@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:35:01 -0800
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [NEEDS-REVIEW] [PATCH v18 05/25] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce CET
MSR and XSAVES supervisor states
On 1/29/2021 1:00 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 1/27/21 1:25 PM, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> @@ -135,6 +135,8 @@ enum xfeature {
>> #define XFEATURE_MASK_PT (1 << XFEATURE_PT_UNIMPLEMENTED_SO_FAR)
>> #define XFEATURE_MASK_PKRU (1 << XFEATURE_PKRU)
>> #define XFEATURE_MASK_PASID (1 << XFEATURE_PASID)
>> +#define XFEATURE_MASK_CET_USER (1 << XFEATURE_CET_USER)
>> +#define XFEATURE_MASK_CET_KERNEL (1 << XFEATURE_CET_KERNEL)
>> #define XFEATURE_MASK_LBR (1 << XFEATURE_LBR)
>>
>> #define XFEATURE_MASK_FPSSE (XFEATURE_MASK_FP | XFEATURE_MASK_SSE)
>> @@ -237,6 +239,23 @@ struct pkru_state {
>> u32 pad;
>> } __packed;
>>
>> +/*
>> + * State component 11 is Control-flow Enforcement user states
>> + */
>> +struct cet_user_state {
>> + u64 user_cet; /* user control-flow settings */
>> + u64 user_ssp; /* user shadow stack pointer */
>> +};
>
> Andy Cooper just mentioned on IRC about this nugget in the spec:
>
> XRSTORS on CET state will do reserved bit and canonicality
> checks on the state in similar manner as done by the WRMSR to
> these state elements.
>
> We're using copy_kernel_to_xregs_err(), so the #GP *should* be OK.
> Could we prove this out in practice, please?
>
Do we want to verify that setting reserved bits in CET XSAVES states
triggers GP? Then, yes, I just verified it again. Thanks for
reminding. Do we have any particular case relating to this?
--
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists