Message-ID: <CA+=V6c05LVmi65ZXjWhhAic6TABnoPuhc7d2gTVoZdK34trDcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 29 Jan 2021 14:50:20 -0800
From:   Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>
To:     Peter Hilber <peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
        Hartmut Knaack <knaack.h@....de>,
        Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
        Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
        Enrico Granata <egranata@...gle.com>,
        Mikhail Golubev <mikhail.golubev@...nsynergy.com>,
        Igor Skalkin <Igor.Skalkin@...nsynergy.com>,
        Ankit Arora <ankitarora@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/1] iio/scmi: Adding support for IIO SCMI Based Sensors

Hi Peter,

I have modified the comments in v4 of that patch. Regarding your
suggestion of this driver handling a greater value range
by adjusting the scale accordingly, it would also require the driver
to change the sensor readings as well based on the updated scale and
the accuracy of the sensor reading will be lost as the sensor readings
are 64 bit integers and not float.
If the IIO driver needs to support a 64 bit sensor range, then I would
prefer to add a new IIO val type for 64 bit fractional value which
takes 4 int vals: val_high,val_low, val2_high and val2_low.

Thanks,
Jyoti

On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 7:29 AM Peter Hilber
<peter.hilber@...nsynergy.com> wrote:
>
> On 22.01.21 00:21, Jyoti Bhayana wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > +
> > +static int scmi_iio_get_sensor_max_range(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int *val,
> > +                                      int *val2)
> > +{
> > +     struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > +     int max_range_high, max_range_low;
> > +     long long max_range;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * All the axes are supposed to have the same value for max range.
> > +      * We are just using the values from the Axis 0 here.
> > +      */
> > +     if (sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].extended_attrs) {
> > +             max_range = sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].attrs.max_range;
> > +             max_range_high = H32(max_range);
> > +             max_range_low = L32(max_range);
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * As IIO Val types have no provision for 64 bit values,
> > +              * and currently there are no known sensors using 64 bit
> > +              * for the range, this driver only supports sensor with
> > +              * 32 bit range value.
> > +              */
> This comment and the corresponding one in
> scmi_iio_get_sensor_min_range() seem to be misleading to me. The extrema
> will probably exceed 32 bits even for physical sensors which do have
> less than 32 bits of resolution. The reason is that the SCMI sensor
> management protocol does not transmit a `scale' value as used by IIO.
> Instead, SCMI transmits an exponent with base ten.
>
> So, an SCMI sensor with a unit/LSB value which is not a power of ten
> will have its unit/LSB value split into an exponent (with base ten) and
> a mantissa.
>
> The SCMI platform (which exposes the physical sensor) will have to
> incorporate the mantissa into the sensor value. The simplest approach is
> to just multiply the mantissa with the raw physical sensor value, which
> will use more bits than the raw physical sensor value, depending on the
> unit/LSB value (and on the split of the unit/LSB value into exponent and
> mantissa).
>
> So I think the comment should at least make clear that the overflow may
> also happen for physical sensors with less than 32 bit of resolution,
> since it cannot be assumed that SCMI platforms will, without any
> apparent need, restrict the values to 32 bits, when that would mean
> additional complexity and potential loss of accuracy. (And in the long
> term this driver could IMHO try to handle a greater value range by
> adjusting the `scale' value accordingly.)
>
> Best regards,
>
> Peter
>
> > +             if (max_range_high != 0)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             *val = max_range_low;
> > +             *val2 = 1;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void scmi_iio_get_sensor_resolution(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int *val,
> > +                                        int *val2)
> > +{
> > +     struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * All the axes are supposed to have the same value for resolution
> > +      * and exponent. We are just using the values from the Axis 0 here.
> > +      */
> > +     if (sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].extended_attrs) {
> > +             uint resolution = sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].resolution;
> > +             s8 exponent = sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].exponent;
> > +             s8 scale = sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].scale;
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * To provide the raw value for the resolution to the userspace,
> > +              * need to divide the resolution exponent by the sensor scale
> > +              */
> > +             exponent = exponent - scale;
> > +             if (exponent >= 0) {
> > +                     *val = resolution * int_pow(10, exponent);
> > +                     *val2 = 1;
> > +             } else {
> > +                     *val = resolution;
> > +                     *val2 = int_pow(10, abs(exponent));
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scmi_iio_get_sensor_min_range(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int *val,
> > +                                      int *val2)
> > +{
> > +     struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > +     int min_range_high, min_range_low;
> > +     long long min_range;
> > +
> > +     /*
> > +      * All the axes are supposed to have the same value for min range.
> > +      * We are just using the values from the Axis 0 here.
> > +      */
> > +     if (sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].extended_attrs) {
> > +             min_range = sensor->sensor_info->axis[0].attrs.min_range;
> > +             min_range_high = H32(min_range);
> > +             min_range_low = L32(min_range);
> > +
> > +             /*
> > +              * As IIO Val types have no provision for 64 bit values,
> > +              * and currently there are no known sensors using 64 bit
> > +              * for the range, this driver only supports sensor with
> > +              * 32 bit range value.
> > +              */
> > +             if (min_range_high != 0xFFFFFFFF)
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +             *val = min_range_low;
> > +             *val2 = 1;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scmi_iio_set_sensor_range_avail(struct iio_dev *iio_dev)
> > +{
> > +     struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > +     int ret;
> > +
> > +     ret = scmi_iio_get_sensor_min_range(iio_dev, &sensor->range_avail[0],
> > +                                         &sensor->range_avail[1]);
> > +     if (ret)
> > +             return ret;
> > +
> > +     scmi_iio_get_sensor_resolution(iio_dev, &sensor->range_avail[2],
> > +                                    &sensor->range_avail[3]);
> > +     ret = scmi_iio_get_sensor_max_range(iio_dev, &sensor->range_avail[4],
> > +                                         &sensor->range_avail[5]);
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scmi_iio_set_sampling_freq_avail(struct iio_dev *iio_dev)
> > +{
> > +     u64 cur_interval_ns, low_interval_ns, high_interval_ns, step_size_ns,
> > +             hz, uhz;
> > +     unsigned int cur_interval, low_interval, high_interval, step_size;
> > +     struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor = iio_priv(iio_dev);
> > +     int i;
> > +
> > +     sensor->freq_avail = devm_kzalloc(&iio_dev->dev,
> > +                                       sizeof(u32) * (sensor->sensor_info->intervals.count * 2),
> > +                                       GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!sensor->freq_avail)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     if (sensor->sensor_info->intervals.segmented) {
> > +             low_interval = sensor->sensor_info->intervals
> > +                                    .desc[SCMI_SENS_INTVL_SEGMENT_LOW];
> > +             low_interval_ns = scmi_iio_convert_interval_to_ns(low_interval);
> > +             convert_ns_to_freq(low_interval_ns, &hz, &uhz);
> > +             sensor->freq_avail[0] = hz;
> > +             sensor->freq_avail[1] = uhz;
> > +
> > +             step_size = sensor->sensor_info->intervals
> > +                                 .desc[SCMI_SENS_INTVL_SEGMENT_STEP];
> > +             step_size_ns = scmi_iio_convert_interval_to_ns(step_size);
> > +             convert_ns_to_freq(step_size_ns, &hz, &uhz);
> > +             sensor->freq_avail[2] = hz;
> > +             sensor->freq_avail[3] = uhz;
> > +
> > +             high_interval = sensor->sensor_info->intervals
> > +                                     .desc[SCMI_SENS_INTVL_SEGMENT_HIGH];
> > +             high_interval_ns =
> > +                     scmi_iio_convert_interval_to_ns(high_interval);
> > +             convert_ns_to_freq(high_interval_ns, &hz, &uhz);
> > +             sensor->freq_avail[4] = hz;
> > +             sensor->freq_avail[5] = uhz;
> > +     } else {
> > +             for (i = 0; i < sensor->sensor_info->intervals.count; i++) {
> > +                     cur_interval = sensor->sensor_info->intervals.desc[i];
> > +                     cur_interval_ns = scmi_iio_convert_interval_to_ns(cur_interval);
> > +                     convert_ns_to_freq(cur_interval_ns, &hz, &uhz);
> > +                     sensor->freq_avail[i * 2] = hz;
> > +                     sensor->freq_avail[i * 2 + 1] = uhz;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scmi_iio_buffers_setup(struct iio_dev *scmi_iiodev)
> > +{
> > +     struct iio_buffer *buffer;
> > +
> > +     buffer = devm_iio_kfifo_allocate(&scmi_iiodev->dev);
> > +     if (!buffer)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     iio_device_attach_buffer(scmi_iiodev, buffer);
> > +     scmi_iiodev->modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_SOFTWARE;
> > +     scmi_iiodev->setup_ops = &scmi_iio_buffer_ops;
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scmi_alloc_iiodev(struct device *dev, struct scmi_handle *handle,
> > +                          const struct scmi_sensor_info *sensor_info,
> > +                          struct iio_dev **scmi_iio_dev)
> > +{
> > +     struct iio_chan_spec *iio_channels;
> > +     struct scmi_iio_priv *sensor;
> > +     enum iio_modifier modifier;
> > +     enum iio_chan_type type;
> > +     struct iio_dev *iiodev;
> > +     int i, ret;
> > +
> > +     iiodev = devm_iio_device_alloc(dev, sizeof(*sensor));
> > +     if (!iiodev)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     iiodev->modes = INDIO_DIRECT_MODE;
> > +     iiodev->dev.parent = dev;
> > +     sensor = iio_priv(iiodev);
> > +     sensor->handle = handle;
> > +     sensor->sensor_info = sensor_info;
> > +     sensor->sensor_update_nb.notifier_call = scmi_iio_sensor_update_cb;
> > +     sensor->indio_dev = iiodev;
> > +
> > +     /* adding one additional channel for timestamp */
> > +     iiodev->num_channels = sensor_info->num_axis + 1;
> > +     iiodev->name = sensor_info->name;
> > +     iiodev->info = &scmi_iio_info;
> > +
> > +     iio_channels =
> > +             devm_kzalloc(dev,
> > +                          sizeof(*iio_channels) * (iiodev->num_channels),
> > +                          GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!iio_channels)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     scmi_iio_set_sampling_freq_avail(iiodev);
> > +
> > +     ret = scmi_iio_set_sensor_range_avail(iiodev);
> > +     if (ret) {
> > +             dev_err(dev, "Error while setting the sensor %s range %d",
> > +                     sensor_info->name, ret);
> > +             return ret;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < sensor_info->num_axis; i++) {
> > +             ret = scmi_iio_get_chan_type(sensor_info->axis[i].type, &type);
> > +             if (ret < 0)
> > +                     return ret;
> > +
> > +             ret = scmi_iio_get_chan_modifier(sensor_info->axis[i].name,
> > +                                              &modifier);
> > +             if (ret < 0)
> > +                     return ret;
> > +
> > +             scmi_iio_set_data_channel(&iio_channels[i], type, modifier,
> > +                                       sensor_info->axis[i].id);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     scmi_iio_set_timestamp_channel(&iio_channels[i], i);
> > +     iiodev->channels = iio_channels;
> > +     *scmi_iio_dev = iiodev;
> > +     return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int scmi_iio_dev_probe(struct scmi_device *sdev)
> > +{
> > +     const struct scmi_sensor_info *sensor_info;
> > +     struct scmi_handle *handle = sdev->handle;
> > +     struct device *dev = &sdev->dev;
> > +     struct iio_dev *scmi_iio_dev;
> > +     u16 nr_sensors;
> > +     int err, i;
> > +
> > +     if (!handle || !handle->sensor_ops || !handle->sensor_ops->count_get ||
> > +         !handle->sensor_ops->info_get || !handle->sensor_ops->config_get ||
> > +         !handle->sensor_ops->config_set) {
> > +             dev_err(dev, "SCMI device has no sensor interface\n");
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     nr_sensors = handle->sensor_ops->count_get(handle);
> > +     if (!nr_sensors) {
> > +             dev_dbg(dev, "0 sensors found via SCMI bus\n");
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     dev_dbg(dev, "%d sensors found via SCMI bus\n", nr_sensors);
> > +
> > +     for (i = 0; i < nr_sensors; i++) {
> > +             sensor_info = handle->sensor_ops->info_get(handle, i);
> > +             if (!sensor_info) {
> > +                     dev_err(dev, "SCMI sensor %d has missing info\n", i);
> > +                     return -EINVAL;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             /* Skipping scalar sensor,as this driver only supports accel and gyro */
> > +             if (sensor_info->num_axis == 0)
> > +                     continue;
> > +
> > +             err = scmi_alloc_iiodev(dev, handle, sensor_info,
> > +                                     &scmi_iio_dev);
> > +             if (err < 0) {
> > +                     dev_err(dev,
> > +                             "failed to allocate IIO device for sensor %s: %d\n",
> > +                             sensor_info->name, err);
> > +                     return err;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             err = scmi_iio_buffers_setup(scmi_iio_dev);
> > +             if (err < 0) {
> > +                     dev_err(dev,
> > +                             "IIO buffer setup error at sensor %s: %d\n",
> > +                             sensor_info->name, err);
> > +                     return err;
> > +             }
> > +
> > +             err = devm_iio_device_register(dev, scmi_iio_dev);
> > +             if (err) {
> > +                     dev_err(dev,
> > +                             "IIO device registration failed at sensor %s: %d\n",
> > +                             sensor_info->name, err);
> > +                     return err;
> > +             }
> > +     }
> > +     return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct scmi_device_id scmi_id_table[] = {
> > +     { SCMI_PROTOCOL_SENSOR, "iiodev" },
> > +     {},
> > +};
> > +
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(scmi, scmi_id_table);
> > +
> > +static struct scmi_driver scmi_iiodev_driver = {
> > +     .name = "scmi-sensor-iiodev",
> > +     .probe = scmi_iio_dev_probe,
> > +     .id_table = scmi_id_table,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_scmi_driver(scmi_iiodev_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jyoti Bhayana <jbhayana@...gle.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("SCMI IIO Driver");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> >
>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists