[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGngYiVRTj4i=2LcQZPutZkFsEgd6Y-YYe9ggMw2pPOTxRBUEQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 18:10:53 -0500
From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Bryan Whitehead <bryan.whitehead@...rochip.com>,
Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
David S Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Alexey Denisov <rtgbnm@...il.com>,
Sergej Bauer <sbauer@...ckbox.su>,
Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
Anders Rønningen <anders@...ningen.priv.no>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 6:08 PM Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Okay. I found it a bit hard to parse how much true code change was
> mixed in with just reindenting existing code. If a lot, then no need
> to split of the code refactor.
Thank you. The code is quite hard to review in patch format.
Probably easier to apply the patch first, then read the replaced
function.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists