[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB6PR0401MB2438891390D0AAD12B30586B8FB99@DB6PR0401MB2438.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 02:55:41 +0000
From: "Biwen Li (OSS)" <biwen.li@....nxp.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
"Biwen Li (OSS)" <biwen.li@....nxp.com>
CC: "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
Subject: RE: [v2] irqchip: ls-extirq: add flag IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to remove
call trace
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> Sent: 2021年1月28日 17:02
> To: Biwen Li (OSS) <biwen.li@....nxp.com>
> Cc: mark.rutland@....com; Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>; tglx@...utronix.de;
> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@....com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>
> Subject: Re: [v2] irqchip: ls-extirq: add flag IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to
> remove call trace
>
> On 2021-01-28 02:37, Biwen Li (OSS) wrote:
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
> >> Sent: 2021年1月27日 19:38
> >> To: Biwen Li (OSS) <biwen.li@....nxp.com>
> >> Cc: mark.rutland@....com; Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>;
> >> tglx@...utronix.de; jason@...edaemon.net;
> >> linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Jiafei Pan <jiafei.pan@....com>;
> >> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; Ran Wang <ran.wang_1@....com>;
> >> Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>
> >> Subject: Re: [v2] irqchip: ls-extirq: add flag IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE
> >> to remove call trace
> >>
> >> On 2021-01-27 08:58, Biwen Li wrote:
> >> > From: Biwen Li <biwen.li@....com>
> >> >
> >> > Add flag IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to remove call trace as follow, ...
> >> > [ 45.605239] Unbalanced IRQ 120 wake disable
> >> > [ 45.609445] WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1124 at kernel/irq/manage.c:800
> >> > irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> >> > ...
> >> > [ 45.645141] pstate: 60000085 (nZCv daIf -PAN -UAO -TCO BTYPE=--)
> >> > [ 45.651144] pc : irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> >> > [ 45.655497] lr : irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> >> > ...
> >> > [ 45.742825] Call trace:
> >> > [ 45.745268] irq_set_irq_wake+0x154/0x1a0
> >> > [ 45.749278] ds3232_resume+0x38/0x50
> >> >
> >> > On ls2088ardb:
> >> > In suspend progress(# echo mem > /sys/power/state),
> >> >
> >>
> pm_suspend()->suspend_devices_and_enter()->dpm_suspend()->device_susp
> >> e
> >> > nd()
> >> > ->ds3232_suspend()->enable_irq_wake()->irq_set_irq_wake()
> >> > ->set_irq_wake_real(), return -ENXIO, there get
> >> > "Cannot set wakeup source" in ds3232_suspend().
> >> >
> >> > In resume progress(wakeup by flextimer)
> >> > dpm_resume_end()->dpm_resume()
> >> > ->device_resume()->ds3232_resume()
> >> > ->disable_irq_wake()->irq_set_irq_wake()
> >> > ->set_irq_wake_real(), there get
> >> > kernel call trace(Unbalanced IRQ 120 wake
> >> > disable)
> >>
> >> This is again paraphrasing the stack trace instead of explaining the
> >> problem it fixes. How about:
> >>
> >> "The ls-extirq driver doesn't implement the irq_set_wake()
> >> callback, while being wake-up capable. This results in
> >> ugly behaviours across suspend/resume cycles.
> >>
> >> Advertise this by adding IRQCHIP_SKIP_SET_WAKE to the irqchip
> >> flags"
> >>
> >> The subject line should be fixed along the same lines, and a Fixes:
> >> tag added.
> > Okay, got it. Thanks. Will update in v3.
>
> ... and v3 still doesn't have a Fixes: tag.
>
> Frankly, if you can't be bothered to do this, why should I worry about your
> platform being broken?
Oh, sorry. Don't know how to add a fixes? Any suggestions? Thanks.
>
> M.
> --
> Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists