linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/5] bpf: Expose bpf_get_socket

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 30 Jan 2021 12:35:21 +0100
From:   Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
To:     Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/5] bpf: Expose bpf_get_socket_cookie to
 tracing programs

On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 10:01 PM Andrii Nakryiko
<andrii.nakryiko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 10:36 AM Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > This needs a new helper that:
> > - can work in a sleepable context (using sock_gen_cookie)
> > - takes a struct sock pointer and checks that it's not NULL
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>
> > Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  include/linux/bpf.h            |  1 +
> >  include/uapi/linux/bpf.h       |  8 ++++++++
> >  kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c       |  2 ++
> >  net/core/filter.c              | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h |  8 ++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > index 1aac2af12fed..26219465e1f7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -1874,6 +1874,7 @@ extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_per_cpu_ptr_proto;
> >  extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_this_cpu_ptr_proto;
> >  extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_ktime_get_coarse_ns_proto;
> >  extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_sock_from_file_proto;
> > +extern const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_get_socket_ptr_cookie_proto;
> >
> >  const struct bpf_func_proto *bpf_tracing_func_proto(
> >         enum bpf_func_id func_id, const struct bpf_prog *prog);
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > index 0b735c2729b2..5855c398d685 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> > @@ -1673,6 +1673,14 @@ union bpf_attr {
> >   *     Return
> >   *             A 8-byte long unique number.
> >   *
> > + * u64 bpf_get_socket_cookie(void *sk)
>
> should the type be `struct sock *` then?

Oh, absolutely. :) Thank you Andrii