[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210130014547.123006-1-andrealmeid@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:45:46 -0300
From: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
To: corbet@....net
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>,
Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] docs: Make syscalls' helpers naming consistent
The documentation explains the need to create internal syscalls' helpers,
and that they should be called `kern_xyzzy()`. However, the comment at
include/linux/syscall.h says that they should be named as
`ksys_xyzzy()`, and so are all the helpers declared bellow it. Change the
documentation to reflect this.
Cc: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Fixes: 819671ff849b ("syscalls: define and explain goal to not call syscalls in the kernel")
Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>
---
Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
index a3ecb236576c..61bdaec188ea 100644
--- a/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
+++ b/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst
@@ -501,7 +501,7 @@ table, but not from elsewhere in the kernel. If the syscall functionality is
useful to be used within the kernel, needs to be shared between an old and a
new syscall, or needs to be shared between a syscall and its compatibility
variant, it should be implemented by means of a "helper" function (such as
-``kern_xyzzy()``). This kernel function may then be called within the
+``ksys_xyzzy()``). This kernel function may then be called within the
syscall stub (``sys_xyzzy()``), the compatibility syscall stub
(``compat_sys_xyzzy()``), and/or other kernel code.
--
2.30.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists