linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 30 Jan 2021 13:50:32 +0000
From:   Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:     Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, <patches@...nelci.org>,
        <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>,
        linux-stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, <pavel@...x.de>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/32] 5.10.12-rc1 review


On 29/01/2021 18:22, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 16:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.12 release.
>> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
Replying here because I don't have the original.

Test results for stable-v5.10:
    12 builds:	12 pass, 0 fail
    26 boots:	26 pass, 0 fail
    65 tests:	65 pass, 0 fail

Linux version:	5.10.12-rc1-g324e71045b28
Boards tested:	tegra124-jetson-tk1, tegra186-p2771-0000,
                tegra194-p2972-0000, tegra20-ventana,
                tegra210-p2371-2180, tegra210-p3450-0000,
                tegra30-cardhu-a04

Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>

Jon


-- 
nvpublic