linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: ipa: don't disable NAPI in suspend

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF=yD-L1SKzu+gsma7KN4VjGnma-_w+amXx=Y_0e78rQiUCu7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 30 Jan 2021 10:25:16 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, elder@...nel.org,
        evgreen@...omium.org, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
        cpratapa@...eaurora.org,
        Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan <subashab@...eaurora.org>,
        Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 9/9] net: ipa: don't disable NAPI in suspend

On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 3:29 PM Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> The channel stop and suspend paths both call __gsi_channel_stop(),
> which quiesces channel activity, disables NAPI, and (on other than
> SDM845) stops the channel.  Similarly, the start and resume paths
> share __gsi_channel_start(), which starts the channel and re-enables
> NAPI again.
>
> Disabling NAPI should be done when stopping a channel, but this
> should *not* be done when suspending.  It's not necessary in the
> suspend path anyway, because the stopped channel (or suspended
> endpoint on SDM845) will not cause interrupts to schedule NAPI,
> and gsi_channel_trans_quiesce() won't return until there are no
> more transactions to process in the NAPI polling loop.

But why is it incorrect to do so?

>From a quick look, virtio-net disables on both remove and freeze, for instance.

> Instead, enable NAPI in gsi_channel_start(), when the completion
> interrupt is first enabled.  Disable it again in gsi_channel_stop(),
> when finally disabling the interrupt.
>
> Add a call to napi_synchronize() to __gsi_channel_stop(), to ensure
> NAPI polling is done before moving on.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
> ---
=
> @@ -894,12 +894,16 @@ int gsi_channel_start(struct gsi *gsi, u32 channel_id)
>         struct gsi_channel *channel = &gsi->channel[channel_id];
>         int ret;
>
> -       /* Enable the completion interrupt */
> +       /* Enable NAPI and the completion interrupt */
> +       napi_enable(&channel->napi);
>         gsi_irq_ieob_enable_one(gsi, channel->evt_ring_id);
>
>         ret = __gsi_channel_start(channel, true);
> -       if (ret)
> -               gsi_irq_ieob_disable_one(gsi, channel->evt_ring_id);
> +       if (!ret)
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       gsi_irq_ieob_disable_one(gsi, channel->evt_ring_id);
> +       napi_disable(&channel->napi);
>
>         return ret;
>  }

subjective, but easier to parse when the normal control flow is linear
and the error path takes a branch (or goto, if reused).