[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ad016e07e5d8c8584981dfbc920eda9c80e3459a.camel@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2021 22:47:43 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Majczak <lma@...ihalf.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>
Cc: Tj <ml.linux@...oe.vision>, Dirk Gouders <dirk@...ders.net>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Radoslaw Biernacki <rad@...ihalf.com>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Alex Levin <levinale@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm_tis: Add missing tpm_request/relinquish_locality
calls
On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 22:40 +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 14:07 +0100, Lukasz Majczak wrote:
> > There is a missing call to tpm_request_locality before the call to
> > the tpm_get_timeouts() and tpm_tis_probe_irq_single(). As the current
> > approach might work for tpm2, it fails for tpm1.x - in that case
> > call to tpm_get_timeouts() or tpm_tis_probe_irq_single()
> > without locality fails and in turn causes tpm_tis_core_init() to fail.
> > Tested on Samsung Chromebook Pro (Caroline).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majczak <lma@...ihalf.com>
>
> Is it possible that you test against linux-next and see if any
> problems still arise? I've applied the locality fixes from James.
Also one nit: if any problems still persist, please add a snippet
from klog to your commit message.
/Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists