linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] x86: fix get_nr_restart

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHk-=wjJerA3xGtK8HdEcdAnmaaTz-iVvc_xqokzNTBivKomVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:19:26 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
        Pedro Alves <palves@...hat.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 0/4] x86: fix get_nr_restart_syscall()

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:18 AM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, looks sane to me.

Oh, and in a perfect world we'd have a test for this condition too, no?

                 Linus