linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm_dp_mst_topology: use correct AUX channel

Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Date:   Tue, 2 Feb 2021 00:13:50 +0200
From:   Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Sam McNally <sammc@...omium.org>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>,
        Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] drm_dp_mst_topology: use correct AUX channel

On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:13:53PM +1000, Sam McNally wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
> 
> For adapters behind an MST hub use the correct AUX channel.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
> [sammc@...omium.org: rebased, removing redundant changes]
> Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc@...omium.org>
> ---
> 
> (no changes since v1)
> 
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 15b6cc39a754..0d753201adbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -2255,6 +2255,9 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_unlink_port(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>  	drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port);
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t
> +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg);
> +
>  static struct drm_dp_mst_port *
>  drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev,
>  		    struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> @@ -2271,9 +2274,13 @@ drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	port->port_num = port_number;
>  	port->mgr = mgr;
>  	port->aux.name = "DPMST";
> +	mutex_init(&port->aux.hw_mutex);
> +	mutex_init(&port->aux.cec.lock);
>  	port->aux.dev = dev->dev;
>  	port->aux.is_remote = true;
>  
> +	port->aux.transfer = drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer;
> +

This was supposed to be handled via higher levels checking for
is_remote==true.

>  	/* initialize the MST downstream port's AUX crc work queue */
>  	drm_dp_remote_aux_init(&port->aux);
>  
> @@ -3503,6 +3510,35 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static ssize_t
> +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg)
> +{
> +	struct drm_dp_mst_port *port =
> +		container_of(aux, struct drm_dp_mst_port, aux);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) {
> +	case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE:
> +	case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE:
> +	case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE:
> +		ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(port->mgr, port, msg->address,
> +					     msg->size, msg->buffer);

That doesn't make sense to me. I2c writes and DPCD writes
are definitely not the same thing.

aux->transfer is a very low level thing. I don't think it's the
correct level of abstraction for sideband.

> +		break;
> +
> +	case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ:
> +	case DP_AUX_I2C_READ:
> +		ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_read(port->mgr, port, msg->address,
> +					    msg->size, msg->buffer);
> +		break;
> +
> +	default:
> +		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
>  static int drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(u8 dp_link_bw, u8  dp_link_count)
>  {
>  	if (dp_link_bw == 0 || dp_link_count == 0)
> -- 
> 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives