[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13608cdc-2068-6340-6795-28944c9fe3ca@ozlabs.ru>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:18:34 +1100
From: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Matt Mullins <mmullins@...x.us>, paulmck <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] tracepoint: Do not fail unregistering a probe due to
memory failure
On 31/01/2021 01:42, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 2021 09:36:26 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
>> Do you still have the same crash with v3 (that's the one I'm going to
>> go with for now.)
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201118093405.7a6d2290@gandalf.local.home
>
> Just curious, does the following patch fix it for v5?
Yes it does!
>
> -- Steve
>
> diff --git a/kernel/tracepoint.c b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> index 7261fa0f5e3c..cf3a6d104fdb 100644
> --- a/kernel/tracepoint.c
> +++ b/kernel/tracepoint.c
> @@ -306,6 +306,7 @@ static int tracepoint_remove_func(struct tracepoint *tp,
> tp->unregfunc();
>
> static_key_disable(&tp->key);
> + tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
> rcu_assign_pointer(tp->funcs, tp_funcs);
> } else {
> rcu_assign_pointer(tp->funcs, tp_funcs);
>
--
Alexey
Powered by blists - more mailing lists