[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4A2E5039-D8EA-4689-8147-4F12338CFBBE@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 23:30:57 -0800
From: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/20] mm/tlb: fix fullmm semantics
> On Jan 30, 2021, at 6:57 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 5:19 PM Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Jan 30, 2021, at 5:02 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 4:16 PM Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
>>>> From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
>>>>
>>>> fullmm in mmu_gather is supposed to indicate that the mm is torn-down
>>>> (e.g., on process exit) and can therefore allow certain optimizations.
>>>> However, tlb_finish_mmu() sets fullmm, when in fact it want to say that
>>>> the TLB should be fully flushed.
>>>
>>> Maybe also rename fullmm?
>>
>> Possible. How about mm_torn_down?
>
> Sure. Or mm_exiting, perhaps?
mm_exiting indeed sounds better.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists