| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <ceb96527b6f7bb662eec813f05b897a551ebd0b2.1612140117.git.maciej.szmigiero@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 09:13:31 +0100
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Make HVA handler retpoline-friendly
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
When retpolines are enabled they have high overhead in the inner loop
inside kvm_handle_hva_range() that iterates over the provided memory area.
Implement a static dispatch there, just like commit 7a02674d154d
("KVM: x86/mmu: Avoid retpoline on ->page_fault() with TDP") did for the
MMU page fault handler.
This significantly improves performance on the unmap test on the existing
kernel memslot code (tested on a Xeon 8167M machine):
30 slots in use:
Test Before After Improvement
Unmap 0.0368s 0.0353s 4%
Unmap 2M 0.000952s 0.000431s 55%
509 slots in use:
Unmap 0.0872s 0.0777s 11%
Unmap 2M 0.00236s 0.00168s 29%
Looks like performing this indirect call via a retpoline might have
interfered with unrolling of the whole loop in the CPU.
Provide such static dispatch only for kvm_unmap_rmapp() and
kvm_age_rmapp() and their TDP MMU equivalents since other handlers are
called in ranges of single byte only, so they already have high overhead
to begin with if walking over a large memory area.
Signed-off-by: Maciej S. Szmigiero <maciej.szmigiero@...cle.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 59 +++++++++++++------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 116 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 6d16481aa29d..4140e308cf30 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1456,6 +1456,45 @@ static void slot_rmap_walk_next(struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator)
slot_rmap_walk_okay(_iter_); \
slot_rmap_walk_next(_iter_))
+static int kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
+ unsigned long data)
+{
+ u64 *sptep;
+ struct rmap_iterator iter;
+ int young = 0;
+
+ for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
+ young |= mmu_spte_age(sptep);
+
+ trace_kvm_age_page(gfn, level, slot, young);
+ return young;
+}
+
+static int kvm_handle_hva_do(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct slot_rmap_walk_iterator *iterator,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot,
+ unsigned long data,
+ int (*handler)(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ gfn_t gfn,
+ int level,
+ unsigned long data))
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
+ if (handler == kvm_unmap_rmapp)
+ return kvm_unmap_rmapp(kvm, iterator->rmap, memslot,
+ iterator->gfn, iterator->level, data);
+ else if (handler == kvm_age_rmapp)
+ return kvm_age_rmapp(kvm, iterator->rmap, memslot,
+ iterator->gfn, iterator->level, data);
+ else
+#endif
+ return handler(kvm, iterator->rmap, memslot,
+ iterator->gfn, iterator->level, data);
+}
+
static int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
unsigned long start,
unsigned long end,
@@ -1495,8 +1534,9 @@ static int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL,
gfn_start, gfn_end - 1,
&iterator)
- ret |= handler(kvm, iterator.rmap, memslot,
- iterator.gfn, iterator.level, data);
+ ret |= kvm_handle_hva_do(kvm, &iterator,
+ memslot, data,
+ handler);
}
}
@@ -1539,21 +1579,6 @@ int kvm_set_spte_hva(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long hva, pte_t pte)
return r;
}
-static int kvm_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
- struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn, int level,
- unsigned long data)
-{
- u64 *sptep;
- struct rmap_iterator iter;
- int young = 0;
-
- for_each_rmap_spte(rmap_head, &iter, sptep)
- young |= mmu_spte_age(sptep);
-
- trace_kvm_age_page(gfn, level, slot, young);
- return young;
-}
-
static int kvm_test_age_rmapp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_rmap_head *rmap_head,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
int level, unsigned long data)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 2ef8615f9dba..f666b0fab861 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -639,45 +639,6 @@ int kvm_tdp_mmu_map(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa, u32 error_code,
return ret;
}
-static int kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end, unsigned long data,
- int (*handler)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
- struct kvm_mmu_page *root, gfn_t start,
- gfn_t end, unsigned long data))
-{
- struct kvm_memslots *slots;
- struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
- struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
- int ret = 0;
- int as_id;
-
- for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root) {
- as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
- slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id);
- kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots) {
- unsigned long hva_start, hva_end;
- gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_end;
-
- hva_start = max(start, memslot->userspace_addr);
- hva_end = min(end, memslot->userspace_addr +
- (memslot->npages << PAGE_SHIFT));
- if (hva_start >= hva_end)
- continue;
- /*
- * {gfn(page) | page intersects with [hva_start, hva_end)} =
- * {gfn_start, gfn_start+1, ..., gfn_end-1}.
- */
- gfn_start = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_start, memslot);
- gfn_end = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_end + PAGE_SIZE - 1, memslot);
-
- ret |= handler(kvm, memslot, root, gfn_start,
- gfn_end, data);
- }
- }
-
- return ret;
-}
-
static int zap_gfn_range_hva_wrapper(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
struct kvm_mmu_page *root, gfn_t start,
@@ -686,13 +647,6 @@ static int zap_gfn_range_hva_wrapper(struct kvm *kvm,
return zap_gfn_range(kvm, root, start, end, false);
}
-int kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
- unsigned long end)
-{
- return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_range(kvm, start, end, 0,
- zap_gfn_range_hva_wrapper);
-}
-
/*
* Mark the SPTEs range of GFNs [start, end) unaccessed and return non-zero
* if any of the GFNs in the range have been accessed.
@@ -739,6 +693,76 @@ static int age_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
return young;
}
+static int kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_do(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
+ gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
+ unsigned long data,
+ int (*handler)(struct kvm *kvm,
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
+ gfn_t start, gfn_t end,
+ unsigned long data))
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
+ if (handler == zap_gfn_range_hva_wrapper)
+ return zap_gfn_range_hva_wrapper(kvm, slot, root,
+ start, end, data);
+ else if (handler == age_gfn_range)
+ return age_gfn_range(kvm, slot, root, start, end,
+ data);
+ else
+#endif
+ return handler(kvm, slot, root, start, end, data);
+}
+
+static int kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end, unsigned long data,
+ int (*handler)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *root, gfn_t start,
+ gfn_t end, unsigned long data))
+{
+ struct kvm_memslots *slots;
+ struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
+ struct kvm_mmu_page *root;
+ int ret = 0;
+ int as_id;
+
+ for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root) {
+ as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
+ slots = __kvm_memslots(kvm, as_id);
+ kvm_for_each_memslot(memslot, slots) {
+ unsigned long hva_start, hva_end;
+ gfn_t gfn_start, gfn_end;
+
+ hva_start = max(start, memslot->userspace_addr);
+ hva_end = min(end, memslot->userspace_addr +
+ (memslot->npages << PAGE_SHIFT));
+ if (hva_start >= hva_end)
+ continue;
+ /*
+ * {gfn(page) | page intersects with [hva_start, hva_end)} =
+ * {gfn_start, gfn_start+1, ..., gfn_end-1}.
+ */
+ gfn_start = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_start, memslot);
+ gfn_end = hva_to_gfn_memslot(hva_end + PAGE_SIZE - 1, memslot);
+
+ ret |= kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_do(kvm, memslot, root,
+ gfn_start, gfn_end,
+ data, handler);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
+ unsigned long end)
+{
+ return kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_range(kvm, start, end, 0,
+ zap_gfn_range_hva_wrapper);
+}
+
int kvm_tdp_mmu_age_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
unsigned long end)
{
Powered by blists - more mailing lists