linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/11] x86/fault: Fix AMD erratum #91 errata fixup for user code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210201090559.GA8210@lst.de>
Date:   Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:05:59 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Cc:     x86@...nel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] x86/fault: Fix AMD erratum #91 errata fixup for
 user code

On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 09:24:32AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> While we're at it, disable the workaround on all CPUs except AMD Family
> 0xF.  By my reading of the Revision Guide for AMD Athlon™ 64 and AMD
> Opteron™ Processors, only family 0xF is affected.

I think it would be better to have one no risk refression fix that
just probes both user and kernel addresses and a separate one to
restrict the workaround.

> +	if (likely(boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD
> +		   || boot_cpu_data.x86 != 0xf))

Normally kernel style would be to have the || on the first line.