[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210201114649.GA19696@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 12:46:49 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/13] module: use RCU to synchronize find_module
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 04:29:02PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> >
> > - mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
> > + rcu_read_lock_sched();
> > /*
> > * We do not want to block removal of patched modules and therefore
> > * we do not take a reference here. The patches are removed by
> > @@ -74,7 +75,7 @@ static void klp_find_object_module(struct klp_object *obj)
> > if (mod && mod->klp_alive)
>
> RCU always baffles me a bit, so I'll ask. Don't we need
> rcu_dereference_sched() here? "mod" comes from a RCU-protected list, so I
> wonder.
rcu_dereference* is only used for dereferencing points where that
reference itself is RCU protected, that is the lookup of mod itself down
in find_module_all in this case.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists