lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACOAw_zW+xnN7pBmTknuJ1=CGiAvVq0sQhe7D6X8sOjgjF_qeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:11:18 +0900
From:   Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
To:     Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix checkpoint mount option wrong combination

Actually, I think we need to select one among them, disable, enable
and merge. I realized my previous understanding about that was wrong.
In that case of "checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable", the last option
will override the ones before that.
This is how the other mount options like fsync_mode, whint_mode and etc.
So, the answer will be "checkpoint=enable". What do you think?



2021년 2월 1일 (월) 오후 9:40, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>님이 작성:
>
> On 2021/2/1 8:06, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> > From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> >
> > As checkpoint=merge comes in, mount option setting related to
> > checkpoint had been mixed up. Fixed it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >   fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 +++++------
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > index 56696f6cfa86..8231c888c772 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> > @@ -930,20 +930,25 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
> >                               return -EINVAL;
> >                       F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc = arg;
> >                       set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> >                       break;
> >               case Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap:
> >                       if (args->from && match_int(args, &arg))
> >                               return -EINVAL;
> >                       F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap = arg;
> >                       set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> >                       break;
> >               case Opt_checkpoint_disable:
> >                       set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> >                       break;
> >               case Opt_checkpoint_enable:
> >                       clear_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> > +                     clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
>
> What if: -o checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable
>
> Can you please explain the rule of merge/disable/enable combination and their
> result? e.g.
> checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable
> checkpoint=enable,checkpoint=merge
> checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=disable
> checkpoint=disable,checkpoint=merge
>
> If the rule/result is clear, it should be documented.
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> >                       break;
> >               case Opt_checkpoint_merge:
> > +                     clear_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
> >                       set_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
> >                       break;
> >   #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
> > @@ -1142,12 +1147,6 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >       }
> >
> > -     if (test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT) &&
> > -                     test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
> > -             f2fs_err(sbi, "checkpoint=merge cannot be used with checkpoint=disable\n");
> > -             return -EINVAL;
> > -     }
> > -
> >       /* Not pass down write hints if the number of active logs is lesser
> >        * than NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE.
> >        */
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ