linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] vsprintf: dump full information of page flags in pGp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALOAHbBzRLYF2Z--OTuO41UEwvcJsYMzuGVdrrqbnCD9U-Ja0A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 1 Feb 2021 22:44:41 +0800
From:   Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@...il.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, penberg@...nel.org,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] vsprintf: dump full information of page flags in pGp

On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 10:15 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 07:56:10PM +0800, Yafang Shao wrote:
> > - Before the patch,
> > [ 6343.396602] Slab 0x000000004382e02b objects=33 used=3 fp=0x000000009ae06ffc flags=0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head)
> >
> > - After the patch,
> > [ 6871.296131] Slab 0x00000000c0e19a37 objects=33 used=3 fp=0x00000000c4902159 flags=0x17ffffc0010200(Node 0,Zone 2,Lastcpupid 0x1fffff,slab|head)
>
> I would suggest it will be easier to parse as:
>
> flags=0x17ffffc0010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=2|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
>
> That should alleviate the concerns about debugfs format change -- we've
> never guaranteed that flag names won't change, and they now look enough
> like flags that parsers shouldn't fall over them.

Good suggestion!
I will do it as you suggested in the next version.

-- 
Thanks
Yafang