[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4170408.1612192055@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 15:07:35 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, patrick@...terwijk.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just
> > > patches 2-4?
> >
> > Please take it from the mailing list. If there are requests for more
> > changes on the crypto level, I will send another series. I personally am
> > waiting for some sort of verdict on the crypto level...
>
> The entire patch set should be upstreamed as a single patch set, after
> having each of the maintainer's Ack it. In addition, the v6 version is
> missing some Reviewed-by tags. (Stefan will re-post a v7 patch set.)
>
> David, I don't have problem with this patch set being upstreamed via
> the keys subsystem, assuming it's been tested.
Herbert wants the first patch to go through the crypto tree. Maybe all of
them should proceed by that route if Herbert is willing?
What do patches 2-4 do if patch 1 isn't applied?
David
Powered by blists - more mailing lists