lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <61854037cd4d3ac367cfda3f02fd1557b1b3bb8b.1612153322.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon,  1 Feb 2021 09:52:58 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:     Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
        Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V2] opp: Don't ignore clk_get() errors other than -ENOENT

Not all devices that need to use OPP core need to have clocks, a missing
clock is fine in which case -ENOENT shall be returned by clk_get().

Anything else is an error and must be handled properly.

Reported-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
V2:
- s/ENODEV/ENOENT
- Use dev_err_probe()

Stephen, is the understanding correct that -ENOENT is the only error
returned for missing clocks ?

 drivers/opp/core.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/opp/core.c b/drivers/opp/core.c
index a518173fd64a..0beb3ee79523 100644
--- a/drivers/opp/core.c
+++ b/drivers/opp/core.c
@@ -1252,6 +1252,8 @@ static struct opp_table *_update_opp_table_clk(struct device *dev,
 					       struct opp_table *opp_table,
 					       bool getclk)
 {
+	int ret;
+
 	/*
 	 * Return early if we don't need to get clk or we have already tried it
 	 * earlier.
@@ -1261,18 +1263,19 @@ static struct opp_table *_update_opp_table_clk(struct device *dev,
 
 	/* Find clk for the device */
 	opp_table->clk = clk_get(dev, NULL);
-	if (IS_ERR(opp_table->clk)) {
-		int ret = PTR_ERR(opp_table->clk);
 
-		if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
-			dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
-			return ERR_PTR(ret);
-		}
+	ret = PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(opp_table->clk);
+	if (!ret)
+		return opp_table;
 
+	if (ret == -ENOENT) {
 		dev_dbg(dev, "%s: Couldn't find clock: %d\n", __func__, ret);
+		return opp_table;
 	}
 
-	return opp_table;
+	dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
+
+	return ERR_PTR(dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Couldn't find clock\n"));
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ