[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1891546521.01612153681714.JavaMail.epsvc@epcpadp4>
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 12:59:33 +0900
From: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
To: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
Zang Leigang <zangleigang@...ilicon.com>,
Avi Shchislowski <avi.shchislowski@....com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/8] scsi: ufshpb: Make eviction depends on region's
reads
Hi Avri,
> + /*
> + * in host control mode, verify that the exiting region
> + * has less reads
> + */
> + if (ufshpb_mode == HPB_HOST_CONTROL &&
> + atomic64_read(&rgn->reads) > (EVICTION_THRSHLD >> 1))
Why we use shifted value to verify less read? I think we should use another
value to verify.
Thanks,
Daejun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists