[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYMez3c_fT2v2wDuKo5vFvL6MdBXnniYsNvqgFR6LA3+2A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 10:32:26 +0530
From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
To: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
Cc: Rouven Czerwinski <r.czerwinski@...gutronix.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tee: optee: remove need_resched() before cond_resched()
Hi Jens,
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021 at 18:59, Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Rouven and Sumit,
>
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:58 AM Jens Wiklander via OP-TEE
> <op-tee@...ts.trustedfirmware.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rouven and Sumit,
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 25, 2021 at 10:55 AM Jens Wiklander
> > <jens.wiklander@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Testing need_resched() before cond_resched() is not needed as an
> > > equivalent test is done internally in cond_resched(). So drop the
> > > need_resched() test.
> > >
> > > Fixes: dcb3b06d9c34 ("tee: optee: replace might_sleep with cond_resched")
> > > Signed-off-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/tee/optee/call.c | 3 +--
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Can you please test to see that this works in your setups too?
>
> Does this work for you? I'd like to get this patch ready for v5.12.
It does work for me as well.
Tested-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
-Sumit
>
> Thanks,
> Jens
Powered by blists - more mailing lists