linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/26] arm64: kvm: Add standalone ticket spinlock implementation for use at hyp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210201172833.GA15632@willie-the-truck>
Date:   Mon, 1 Feb 2021 17:28:34 +0000
From:   Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To:     Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, android-kvm@...gle.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/26] arm64: kvm: Add standalone ticket spinlock
 implementation for use at hyp

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 12:15:01PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> 
> We will soon need to synchronise multiple CPUs in the hyp text at EL2.
> The qspinlock-based locking used by the host is overkill for this purpose
> and relies on the kernel's "percpu" implementation for the MCS nodes.
> 
> Implement a simple ticket locking scheme based heavily on the code removed
> by commit c11090474d70 ("arm64: locking: Replace ticket lock implementation
> with qspinlock").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..7584c397bbac
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/include/nvhe/spinlock.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> +/*
> + * A stand-alone ticket spinlock implementation for use by the non-VHE
> + * KVM hypervisor code running at EL2.
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 Google LLC
> + * Author: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
> + *
> + * Heavily based on the implementation removed by c11090474d70 which was:
> + * Copyright (C) 2012 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_SPINLOCK_H__
> +#define __ARM64_KVM_NVHE_SPINLOCK_H__
> +
> +#include <asm/alternative.h>
> +#include <asm/lse.h>
> +
> +typedef union hyp_spinlock {
> +	u32	__val;
> +	struct {
> +#ifdef __AARCH64EB__
> +		u16 next, owner;
> +#else
> +		u16 owner, next;
> +	};
> +#endif

Looks like I put this #endif in the wrong place; probably needs to be a line
higher.

Will