[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210202154148.GA12433@lst.de>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 16:41:48 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, live-patching@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] module: pass struct find_symbol_args to
find_symbol
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> > preempt_disable();
> > - sym = find_symbol(symbol, &owner, NULL, NULL, true, true);
> > - if (sym && strong_try_module_get(owner))
> > - sym = NULL;
> > + if (!find_symbol(&fsa) || !strong_try_module_get(fsa.owner)) {
>
> I think this should be in fact
>
> if (!find_symbol(&fsa) || strong_try_module_get(fsa.owner)) {
>
> to get the logic right (note the missing !). We want to return NULL if
> strong_try_module_get() does not succeed for a found symbol.
Indeed. Fixed for the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists