[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3faa02d-e7b2-5ab7-22a8-fc625245ad00@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 18:32:33 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] KVM: SVM: use vmsave/vmload for saving/restoring
additional host state
On 05/01/21 18:20, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> This VMLOAD needs the "handle fault on reboot" goo. Seeing the code, I think
> I'd prefer to handle this in C code, especially if Paolo takes the svm_ops.h
> patch[*]. Actually, I think with that patch it'd make sense to move the
> existing VMSAVE+VMLOAD for the guest into svm.c, too. And completely unrelated,
> the fault handling in svm/vmenter.S can be cleaned up a smidge to eliminate the
> JMPs.
>
> Paolo, what do you think about me folding these patches into my series to do the
> above cleanups? And maybe sending a pull request for the end result? (I'd also
> like to add on a patch to use the user return MSR mechanism for MSR_TSC_AUX).
I have queued that part already, so Mike can rebase on top of kvm/queue.
Paolo
> [*]https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201231002702.2223707-8-seanjc@google.com
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists