lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 2 Feb 2021 21:19:20 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Amy Parker <enbyamy@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-gcc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: Alternative compilers to GCC/Clang

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 11:11:32AM -0800, Amy Parker wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 8:26 AM Amy Parker <enbyamy@...il.com> wrote:
> > > It compiles extremely fast, implements some subsets of gcc (a few
> > > attributes for example), but is far from being able to compile a kernel
> >
> > Well, we'll see what I can do with that. :)
> 
> Well, just installed it and tried building the kernel. Fails every file. :)
> 
> It's definitely something to work towards - but I don't know if kernel
> advancements requiring newer GCC versions will go slow enough to allow
> TCC improvements to arise. This isn't just something like with Clang
> where a few tweaks to files and to Clang itself did the trick.

Maybe this'll help you find something to do:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iU0Z0vBKrtQ

Yes, it would be lovely to be able to compile the kernel with tcc but it
is not going to be trivial.

Good luck.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ