[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 00:02:16 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-media <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ipu3-cio2: Build bridge only if ACPI is enabled
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:37:47PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> On 02/02/2021 20:30, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 12:24:54PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> On 2/2/21 12:14 PM, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >>> ipu3-cio2-bridge uses several features of the ACPI framework that have no
> >>> meaningful replacement when ACPI is disabled. Instead of adding #ifdefs to
> >>> the affected places, only build the bridge code if CONFIG_ACPI is enabled.
> >>>
> >>> Fixes: 803abec64ef9 ("media: ipu3-cio2: Add cio2-bridge to ipu3-cio2 driver")
> >>> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
> >> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> # build-tested
> > Thanks! I'll include this in a pull request to Mauro shortly.
> >
> Ah - thank you both; sorry to have missed that.
No worries; this was missed in review, too. There are just combinations you
don't always end up testing before merging the patches.
--
Regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists