[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:31:31 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-csky@...r.kernel.org" <linux-csky@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 11/20] mm/tlb: remove arch-specific tlb_start/end_vma()
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 07:20:55AM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote:
> Arm does not define tlb_end_vma, and consequently it flushes the TLB after
> each VMA. I suspect it is not intentional.
ARM is one of those that look at the VM_EXEC bit to explicitly flush
ITLB IIRC, so it has to.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists