[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 10:42:22 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Zhiyuan Dai <daizhiyuan@...tium.com.cn>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/hugetlb.c: Fix typos in comments
On 02.02.21 09:46, Zhiyuan Dai wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Zhiyuan Dai <daizhiyuan@...tium.com.cn>
> ---
> mm/hugetlb.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index 18f6ee3..35db386 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -3990,7 +3990,7 @@ void unmap_hugepage_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start,
>
> /*
> * This is called when the original mapper is failing to COW a MAP_PRIVATE
> - * mappping it owns the reserve page for. The intention is to unmap the page
> + * mapping it owns the reserve page for. The intention is to unmap the page
> * from other VMAs and let the children be SIGKILLed if they are faulting the
> * same region.
> */
>
I'm really sorry, but sending four times the same patch with different
things messed up just for fixing a simple typo is absolutely annoying.
Please exercise sending patches somewhere else. This is just unnecessary
noise on linux-mm.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists