[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:56:18 +0000
From: "nakamura.shun@...itsu.com" <nakamura.shun@...itsu.com>
To: 'John Garry' <john.garry@...wei.com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
"mathieu.poirier@...aro.org" <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
"leo.yan@...aro.org" <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"acme@...nel.org" <acme@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com"
<alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
"jolsa@...hat.com" <jolsa@...hat.com>,
"namhyung@...nel.org" <namhyung@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 3/4] perf tools: Fix lexical definition of event name
Hi, John
I have applied this patch and confirmed that the event can be specified correctly.
Event names are defined in the A64FX specification.
I want to deal with it at that time if there is a problem.
So I would like to resend the v5 patch and wait for advice from others.
Best Regards
Shunsuke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists