lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <0c9187f0-39c8-8f7d-79a7-9823cba43c5c@huawei.com> Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:26:03 +0800 From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> CC: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugetlbfs: show pagesize in unit of GB if possible Hi: On 2021/2/2 5:31, David Rientjes wrote: > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021, Miaohe Lin wrote: > >>>> Hugepage size in unit of GB is supported. We could show pagesize in unit of >>>> GB to make it more friendly to read. Also rework the calculation code of >>>> page size unit to make it more readable. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com> >>>> --- >>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 12 ++++++++---- >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >>>> >>>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >>>> index 3a08fbae3b53..40a9795f250a 100644 >>>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >>>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c >>>> @@ -1014,11 +1014,15 @@ static int hugetlbfs_show_options(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root) >>>> if (sbinfo->max_inodes != -1) >>>> seq_printf(m, ",nr_inodes=%lu", sbinfo->max_inodes); >>>> >>>> - hpage_size /= 1024; >>>> - mod = 'K'; >>>> - if (hpage_size >= 1024) { >>>> - hpage_size /= 1024; >>>> + if (hpage_size >= SZ_1G) { >>>> + hpage_size /= SZ_1G; >>>> + mod = 'G'; >>>> + } else if (hpage_size >= SZ_1M) { >>>> + hpage_size /= SZ_1M; >>>> mod = 'M'; >>>> + } else { >>>> + hpage_size /= SZ_1K; >>>> + mod = 'K'; >>>> } >>>> seq_printf(m, ",pagesize=%lu%c", hpage_size, mod); >>>> if (spool) { >>> >>> NACK, this can break existing userspace parsing. >>> . >>> >> >> I see. I should take care of this. Many thanks. >> > > Thanks. It's an important point to emphasize because it shows how > important user-facing interfaces are. Once the hugetlbfs mount options > are printed in the way they are, it becomes very difficult to change them > because there can be userspace in the wild that would break as a result. > This is why it's crucial to be very careful when specifying user-facing > interfaces the first time so they are extensible. > . > Many thanks for detailed explanation! I will keep this in mind! Thanks again.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists