[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 11:13:19 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Ding Tianhong <dingtianhong@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 01/14] ARM: mm: add missing pud_page define to
2-level page tables
On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:05:02PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> index c02f24400369..d63a5bb6bd0c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h
> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ extern struct page *empty_zero_page;
>
> extern pgd_t swapper_pg_dir[PTRS_PER_PGD];
>
> +#define pud_page(pud) pmd_page(__pmd(pud_val(pud)))
> +#define pud_write(pud) pmd_write(__pmd(pud_val(pud)))
As there is no PUD, does it really make sense to return a valid
struct page (which will be the PTE page) for pud_page(), which is
several tables above?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists