| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <042aae34-7e52-bdcc-1154-4ea1ecace39b@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 09:32:06 +0800
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
To: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
CC: <kernel-team@...roid.com>, Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>,
<linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix checkpoint mount option wrong
combination
On 2021/2/2 8:41, Daeho Jeong wrote:
> For less confusion, I am going to separate the "merge" option from
Agreed.
> "checkpoint=".
> I am adding another "ckpt_merge" option. :)
Not sure, maybe "checkpoint_merge" will be better?
"ckpt_merge" looks more like a term only developer knew.
Thanks,
>
> 2021년 2월 2일 (화) 오전 8:33, Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>님이 작성:
>>
>> The rightmost one is the final option. And checkpoint=merge means
>> checkpoint is enabled with a checkpoint thread.
>>
>> mount checkpoint=disable,checkpoint=merge => checkpoint=merge
>> remount checkpoint=enable,checkpoint=merge => checkpoint=merge
>> remount checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=disable => checkpoint=disable
>> remount checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable => checkpoint=enable
>>
>> Like
>>
>> mount fsync_mode=posix, fsync_mode=strict, fsync_mode=nobarrier =>
>> fsync_mode=nobarrier
>>
>> 2021년 2월 2일 (화) 오전 5:11, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>님이 작성:
>>>
>>> On 02/01, Daeho Jeong wrote:
>>>> Actually, I think we need to select one among them, disable, enable
>>>> and merge. I realized my previous understanding about that was wrong.
>>>> In that case of "checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable", the last option
>>>> will override the ones before that.
>>>> This is how the other mount options like fsync_mode, whint_mode and etc.
>>>> So, the answer will be "checkpoint=enable". What do you think?
>>>
>>> We need to clarify a bit more. :)
>>>
>>> mount checkpoint=disable,checkpoint=merge
>>> remount checkpoint=enable,checkpoint=merge
>>>
>>> Then, is it going to enable checkpoint with a thread?
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2021년 2월 1일 (월) 오후 9:40, Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>님이 작성:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 2021/2/1 8:06, Daeho Jeong wrote:
>>>>>> From: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As checkpoint=merge comes in, mount option setting related to
>>>>>> checkpoint had been mixed up. Fixed it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 11 +++++------
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>>> index 56696f6cfa86..8231c888c772 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>>>>> @@ -930,20 +930,25 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap_perc = arg;
>>>>>> set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> + clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> case Opt_checkpoint_disable_cap:
>>>>>> if (args->from && match_int(args, &arg))
>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> F2FS_OPTION(sbi).unusable_cap = arg;
>>>>>> set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> + clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> case Opt_checkpoint_disable:
>>>>>> set_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> + clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> case Opt_checkpoint_enable:
>>>>>> clear_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> + clear_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>
>>>>> What if: -o checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you please explain the rule of merge/disable/enable combination and their
>>>>> result? e.g.
>>>>> checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=enable
>>>>> checkpoint=enable,checkpoint=merge
>>>>> checkpoint=merge,checkpoint=disable
>>>>> checkpoint=disable,checkpoint=merge
>>>>>
>>>>> If the rule/result is clear, it should be documented.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> case Opt_checkpoint_merge:
>>>>>> + clear_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> set_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT);
>>>>>> break;
>>>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_F2FS_FS_COMPRESSION
>>>>>> @@ -1142,12 +1147,6 @@ static int parse_options(struct super_block *sb, char *options, bool is_remount)
>>>>>> return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT) &&
>>>>>> - test_opt(sbi, MERGE_CHECKPOINT)) {
>>>>>> - f2fs_err(sbi, "checkpoint=merge cannot be used with checkpoint=disable\n");
>>>>>> - return -EINVAL;
>>>>>> - }
>>>>>> -
>>>>>> /* Not pass down write hints if the number of active logs is lesser
>>>>>> * than NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists