linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 040/142] KVM: x86/pmu: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning in intel_pmu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue,  2 Feb 2021 14:36:43 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+ae488dc136a4cc6ba32b@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 040/142] KVM: x86/pmu: Fix UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning in intel_pmu_refresh()

From: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>

commit e61ab2a320c3dfd6209efe18a575979e07470597 upstream.

Since we know vPMU will not work properly when (1) the guest bit_width(s)
of the [gp|fixed] counters are greater than the host ones, or (2) guest
requested architectural events exceeds the range supported by the host, so
we can setup a smaller left shift value and refresh the guest cpuid entry,
thus fixing the following UBSAN shift-out-of-bounds warning:

shift exponent 197 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'

Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x107/0x163 lib/dump_stack.c:120
 ubsan_epilogue+0xb/0x5a lib/ubsan.c:148
 __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds.cold+0xb1/0x181 lib/ubsan.c:395
 intel_pmu_refresh.cold+0x75/0x99 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c:348
 kvm_vcpu_after_set_cpuid+0x65a/0xf80 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c:177
 kvm_vcpu_ioctl_set_cpuid2+0x160/0x440 arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c:308
 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl+0x11b6/0x2d70 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c:4709
 kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x7b9/0xdb0 arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3386
 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

Reported-by: syzbot+ae488dc136a4cc6ba32b@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210118025800.34620-1-like.xu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c |    4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/pmu_intel.c
@@ -345,7 +345,9 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm
 
 	pmu->nr_arch_gp_counters = min_t(int, eax.split.num_counters,
 					 x86_pmu.num_counters_gp);
+	eax.split.bit_width = min_t(int, eax.split.bit_width, x86_pmu.bit_width_gp);
 	pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_GP] = ((u64)1 << eax.split.bit_width) - 1;
+	eax.split.mask_length = min_t(int, eax.split.mask_length, x86_pmu.events_mask_len);
 	pmu->available_event_types = ~entry->ebx &
 					((1ull << eax.split.mask_length) - 1);
 
@@ -355,6 +357,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_refresh(struct kvm
 		pmu->nr_arch_fixed_counters =
 			min_t(int, edx.split.num_counters_fixed,
 			      x86_pmu.num_counters_fixed);
+		edx.split.bit_width_fixed = min_t(int,
+			edx.split.bit_width_fixed, x86_pmu.bit_width_fixed);
 		pmu->counter_bitmask[KVM_PMC_FIXED] =
 			((u64)1 << edx.split.bit_width_fixed) - 1;
 	}