lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue,  2 Feb 2021 14:38:03 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>,
        Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 120/142] net/mlx5e: Fix CT rule + encap slow path offload and deletion

From: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>

[ Upstream commit 89e394675818bde8e30e135611c506455fa03fb7 ]

Currently, if a neighbour isn't valid when offloading tunnel encap rules,
we offload the original match and replace the original action with
"goto slow path" action. For this we use a temporary flow attribute based
on the original flow attribute and then change the action. Flow flags,
which among those is the CT flag, are still shared for the slow path rule
offload, so we end up parsing this flow as a CT + goto slow path rule.

Besides being unnecessary, CT action offload saves extra information in
the passed flow attribute, such as created ct_flow and mod_hdr, which
is lost onces the temporary flow attribute is freed.

When a neigh is updated and is valid, we offload the original CT rule
with original CT action, which again creates a ct_flow and mod_hdr
and saves it in the flow's original attribute. Then we delete the slow
path rule with a temporary flow attribute based on original updated
flow attribute, and we free the relevant ct_flow and mod_hdr.

Then when tc deletes this flow, we try to free the ct_flow and mod_hdr
on the flow's attribute again.

To fix the issue, skip all furture proccesing (CT/Sample/Split rules)
in offload/unoffload of slow path rules.

Call trace:
[  758.850525] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000218
[  758.952987] Internal error: Oops: 96000005 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[  758.964170] Modules linked in: act_csum(E) act_pedit(E) act_tunnel_key(E) act_ct(E) nf_flow_table(E) xt_nat(E) ip6table_filter(E) ip6table_nat(E) xt_comment(E) ip6_tables(E) xt_conntrack(E) xt_MASQUERADE(E) nf_conntrack_netlink(E) xt_addrtype(E) iptable_filter(E) iptable_nat(E) bpfilter(E) br_netfilter(E) bridge(E) stp(E) llc(E) xfrm_user(E) overlay(E) act_mirred(E) act_skbedit(E) rdma_ucm(OE) rdma_cm(OE) iw_cm(OE) ib_ipoib(OE) ib_cm(OE) ib_umad(OE) esp6_offload(E) esp6(E) esp4_offload(E) esp4(E) xfrm_algo(E) mlx5_ib(OE) ib_uverbs(OE) geneve(E) ip6_udp_tunnel(E) udp_tunnel(E) nfnetlink_cttimeout(E) nfnetlink(E) mlx5_core(OE) act_gact(E) cls_flower(E) sch_ingress(E) openvswitch(E) nsh(E) nf_conncount(E) nf_nat(E) mlxfw(OE) psample(E) nf_conntrack(E) nf_defrag_ipv4(E) vfio_mdev(E) mdev(E) ib_core(OE) mlx_compat(OE) crct10dif_ce(E) uio_pdrv_genirq(E) uio(E) i2c_mlx(E) mlxbf_pmc(E) sbsa_gwdt(E) mlxbf_gige(E) gpio_mlxbf2(E) mlxbf_pka(E) mlx_trio(E) mlx_bootctl(E) bluefield_edac(E) knem(O)
[  758.964225]  ip_tables(E) mlxbf_tmfifo(E) ipv6(E) crc_ccitt(E) nf_defrag_ipv6(E)
[  759.154186] CPU: 5 PID: 122 Comm: kworker/u16:1 Tainted: G           OE     5.4.60-mlnx.52.gde81e85 #1
[  759.172870] Hardware name: https://www.mellanox.com BlueField SoC/BlueField SoC, BIOS BlueField:3.5.0-2-gc1b5d64 Jan  4 2021
[  759.195466] Workqueue: mlx5e mlx5e_rep_neigh_update [mlx5_core]
[  759.207344] pstate: a0000005 (NzCv daif -PAN -UAO)
[  759.217003] pc : mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x5c/0x160 [mlx5_core]
[  759.228229] lr : mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x34/0x160 [mlx5_core]
[  759.405858] Call trace:
[  759.410804]  mlx5_del_flow_rules+0x5c/0x160 [mlx5_core]
[  759.421337]  __mlx5_eswitch_del_rule.isra.43+0x5c/0x1c8 [mlx5_core]
[  759.433963]  mlx5_eswitch_del_offloaded_rule_ct+0x34/0x40 [mlx5_core]
[  759.446942]  mlx5_tc_rule_delete_ct+0x68/0x74 [mlx5_core]
[  759.457821]  mlx5_tc_ct_delete_flow+0x160/0x21c [mlx5_core]
[  759.469051]  mlx5e_tc_unoffload_fdb_rules+0x158/0x168 [mlx5_core]
[  759.481325]  mlx5e_tc_encap_flows_del+0x140/0x26c [mlx5_core]
[  759.492901]  mlx5e_rep_update_flows+0x11c/0x1ec [mlx5_core]
[  759.504127]  mlx5e_rep_neigh_update+0x160/0x200 [mlx5_core]
[  759.515314]  process_one_work+0x178/0x400
[  759.523350]  worker_thread+0x58/0x3e8
[  759.530685]  kthread+0x100/0x12c
[  759.537152]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[  759.544320] Code: 97ffef55 51000673 3100067f 54ffff41 (b9421ab3)
[  759.556548] ---[ end trace fab818bb1085832d ]---

Fixes: 4c3844d9e97e ("net/mlx5e: CT: Introduce connection tracking")
Signed-off-by: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
index 3be34b1128731..4b8a442f09cd6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c
@@ -1165,6 +1165,9 @@ mlx5e_tc_offload_fdb_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 	struct mlx5e_tc_mod_hdr_acts *mod_hdr_acts;
 	struct mlx5_flow_handle *rule;
 
+	if (attr->flags & MLX5_ESW_ATTR_FLAG_SLOW_PATH)
+		return mlx5_eswitch_add_offloaded_rule(esw, spec, attr);
+
 	if (flow_flag_test(flow, CT)) {
 		mod_hdr_acts = &attr->parse_attr->mod_hdr_acts;
 
@@ -1195,6 +1198,9 @@ mlx5e_tc_unoffload_fdb_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 {
 	flow_flag_clear(flow, OFFLOADED);
 
+	if (attr->flags & MLX5_ESW_ATTR_FLAG_SLOW_PATH)
+		goto offload_rule_0;
+
 	if (flow_flag_test(flow, CT)) {
 		mlx5_tc_ct_delete_flow(get_ct_priv(flow->priv), flow, attr);
 		return;
@@ -1203,6 +1209,7 @@ mlx5e_tc_unoffload_fdb_rules(struct mlx5_eswitch *esw,
 	if (attr->esw_attr->split_count)
 		mlx5_eswitch_del_fwd_rule(esw, flow->rule[1], attr);
 
+offload_rule_0:
 	mlx5_eswitch_del_offloaded_rule(esw, flow->rule[0], attr);
 }
 
-- 
2.27.0



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ