[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bkQOAwAwEnRoZVwKM2sDpHW3bzeWdga4MhxhERvZKT+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 19:22:34 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: bobwxc <bobwxc@...il.cn>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: syzbot reporting less duplicates
On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:39 PM bobwxc <bobwxc@...il.cn> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 05:05:43PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Mon 2021-02-01 11:52:12, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > Could we please get common prefix (like syzbot: KASAN:....) so that
> > the bulk of emails is easier to remove?
> There are several bots testing on the kernel, maybe we should give a prefix
> format for all bot.
> Also we can use mail-address to fliter email, but it's still a little
> inconvenient.
Hi Pavel, bobwxc,
Yes, I was wondering if syzbot in From/To/CC can be used for
filtering? I assume email clients that can filter based on subject can
also filter based on From/To/CC.
Does anybody filter syzbot emails? Maybe you can share what works best?
I am not sure a common prefix for all bots is useful because it
supports only all or nothing. There are also some bots that
maintainers use now that seem to be fundamental to the process, if one
is ignoring them, then they are effectively ignoring what the
maintainer is saying.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists