[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6333c52-52e8-5ace-2c13-ba07e6c403dc@maciej.szmigiero.name>
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 21:09:45 +0100
From: "Maciej S. Szmigiero" <mail@...iej.szmigiero.name>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Aleksandar Markovic <aleksandar.qemu.devel@...il.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Make HVA handler retpoline-friendly
On 03.02.2021 15:43, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 01/02/21 16:19, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>> On 01.02.2021 09:21, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> On 01/02/21 09:13, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>>>> static int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>>>> unsigned long start,
>>>> unsigned long end,
>>>> @@ -1495,8 +1534,9 @@ static int kvm_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm,
>>>
>>>
>>>> -static int kvm_tdp_mmu_handle_hva_range(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long start,
>>>> - unsigned long end, unsigned long data,
>>>> - int (*handler)(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>>>> - struct kvm_mmu_page *root, gfn_t start,
>>>> - gfn_t end, unsigned long data))
>>>> -{
>>>
>>> Can you look into just marking these functions __always_inline? This should help the compiler change (*handler)(...) into a regular function call.
>>
>> That looks even better - I see the compiler then turns the indirect call
>> into a direct one.
>>
>> Will change to __always_inline instead of static dispatch in the next
>> version.
>> Thanks for the pointer.
>
> Feel free to send this separately as it's a self-contained change.
Will do!
> Thanks,
>
> Paolo
>
Thanks,
Maciej
Powered by blists - more mailing lists