linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:14:19 +0000
From:   <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
To:     <thesven73@...il.com>
CC:     <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <rtgbnm@...il.com>,
        <sbauer@...ckbox.su>, <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        <anders@...ningen.priv.no>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets

Hi Sven,

We can test on x86 PC. We will just need about a week after you release your next version.

Thanks,
Bryan

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2021 1:53 PM
> To: Bryan Whitehead - C21958 <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
> Cc: UNGLinuxDriver <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>; David Miller
> <davem@...emloft.net>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Andrew Lunn
> <andrew@...n.ch>; Alexey Denisov <rtgbnm@...il.com>; Sergej Bauer
> <sbauer@...ckbox.su>; Tim Harvey <tharvey@...eworks.com>; Anders
> Rønningen <anders@...ningen.priv.no>; netdev
> <netdev@...r.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
> kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer
> packets
> 
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> 
> Thank you Bryan. I will prepare a v2 early next week.
> 
> Would Microchip be able to donate some time to test v2? My own tests are
> certainly not perfect. Various stress tests across architectures
> (intel/arm) would help create confidence in the multi-buffer frame
> implementation. Perhaps Microchip has various test rigs already set up?
> 
> After all, absence of bugs is more important than speed improvements.