linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <MN2PR11MB36623F8CE310A8CD6BD0398DFAB49@MN2PR11MB3662.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 20:41:35 +0000
From:   <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
To:     <thesven73@...il.com>
CC:     <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
        <kuba@...nel.org>, <andrew@...n.ch>, <rtgbnm@...il.com>,
        <sbauer@...ckbox.su>, <tharvey@...eworks.com>,
        <anders@...ningen.priv.no>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v1 2/6] lan743x: support rx multi-buffer packets

> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 3:14 PM <Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com> wrote:
> >
> > We can test on x86 PC. We will just need about a week after you release
> your next version.
> >
> 
> That's great. If you have any suggestions on how I can improve testing on my
> end, feel free to reach out.

If you are able, in addition to basic rx and tx iperf tests, I would recommend PTP tests.
PTP relies on the time stamps extracted from the extension descriptors, which is directly in the RX path you are modifying.

If you are not able, we will at least cover that for x86 PC.

Thanks,
Bryan