linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf tools: Support PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 18:29:35 -0300
From:   Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To:     "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        peterz@...radead.org, eranian@...gle.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
        jolsa@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, yao.jin@...ux.intel.com,
        maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/9] perf tools: Support PERF_SAMPLE_WEIGHT_STRUCT

Em Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 04:19:34PM -0500, Liang, Kan escreveu:
> 
> 
> On 2/3/2021 3:31 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_event_attr_fprintf.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_event_attr_fprintf.c
> > > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static void __p_sample_type(char *buf, size_t size, u64 value)
> > >   		bit_name(BRANCH_STACK), bit_name(REGS_USER), bit_name(STACK_USER),
> > >   		bit_name(IDENTIFIER), bit_name(REGS_INTR), bit_name(DATA_SRC),
> > >   		bit_name(WEIGHT), bit_name(PHYS_ADDR), bit_name(AUX),
> > > -		bit_name(CGROUP), bit_name(DATA_PAGE_SIZE),
> > > +		bit_name(CGROUP), bit_name(DATA_PAGE_SIZE), bit_name(WEIGHT_STRUCT),
> > I have CODE_PAGE_SIZE in my perf/core branch, was this somehow removed?
> > 
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git/commit/?h=perf/core&id=c1de7f3d84ca324c7cda85c3ce27b11741af2124
> > 
> > I see, you did this patchkit on top of upstream, that has just
> > DATA_PAGE_SIZE, while my perf/core branch has CODE_PAGE_SIZE. I'm
> > adjusting it, please next time do tooling development on acme/perf/core.
> 
> Sorry, I will rebase the patchset on acme/perf/core.

No need. Look at tmp.perf/core, please test it, its all already adjusted
there.

- Arnaldo