linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] misc: bcm-vk: only support ttyVK if CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 3 Feb 2021 14:41:26 -0800
From:   Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Desmond Yan <desmond.yan@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] misc: bcm-vk: only support ttyVK if CONFIG_TTY is set



On 2021-02-03 2:17 p.m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 01:04:51PM -0800, Scott Branden wrote:
>> Correct compile issue if CONFIG_TTY is not set by
>> only adding ttyVK devices if CONFIG_BCM_VK_TTY is set.
>>
>> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@...adcom.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Changes since v3:
> Is this "v4"?  Your subject line doesn't say so :(
Yes, a mistake.  Sent same patch with PATCH v4 on subject line now.
>